Poulin F, Boivin M
Ecole de psychologie, Université Laval, Québec City, Canada.
Psychol Assess. 2000 Jun;12(2):115-22. doi: 10.1037//1040-3590.12.2.115.
This article examines the construct validity of reactive and proactive aggression, as assessed by the teacher-rating scale developed by K. A. Dodge and J. D. Coie (1987). In Study 1 (n = 149 boys), confirmatory factor analyses revealed that a 2-factor model, in which a substantial correlation was observed between the 2 latent factors, presented a better fit than a single-factor model. Study 2 (n = 193 boys) examined the relations presented by the 2 forms of aggression with peer status, leadership, social withdrawal, and victimization by peer. Reactive and proactive aggressive behaviors presented distinct patterns of relations consistent with the theoretical definitions. The results of these studies suggest that the questionnaire measures 2 forms of aggressive behavior that, although being substantially related, have a unique discriminant dimension.
本文考察了由K.A.道奇和J.D.科伊(1987年)编制的教师评定量表所评估的反应性攻击和主动性攻击的结构效度。在研究1(n = 149名男孩)中,验证性因素分析表明,一个双因素模型比单因素模型拟合度更好,在该双因素模型中,两个潜在因素之间存在显著相关性。研究2(n = 193名男孩)考察了这两种攻击形式与同伴地位、领导力、社交退缩以及同伴受害情况之间的关系。反应性攻击行为和主动性攻击行为呈现出与理论定义一致的不同关系模式。这些研究结果表明,该问卷测量了两种攻击行为形式,它们虽然密切相关,但具有独特的区分维度。