Fite Paula J, Stoppelbein Laura, Greening Leilani, Gaertner Alden E
Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2009 Sep;40(3):367-82. doi: 10.1007/s10578-009-0132-2. Epub 2009 Mar 19.
The current study provided further validity for the use of a measure of proactive and reactive aggression that was first developed by Little and his colleagues. Confirmatory factor analyses performed with a high-risk clinical population (N = 107) revealed that the model was a good fit to the data. Structural equation models revealed significant associations in the expected direction between the Little et al. measure and another measure of proactive and reactive aggression developed by Dodge and Coie. Further analyses revealed that the proactive aggression subscales of the Little et al. and Dodge and Coie measures were significantly related to conduct problems. However, the reactive aggression subscale of the Little et al. measure was not related to social problems while both the proactive and reactive aggression subscales of the Dodge and Coie measure were.
当前的研究为使用一种由利特尔及其同事最初开发的主动和反应性攻击行为测量方法提供了进一步的有效性验证。对一个高危临床群体(N = 107)进行的验证性因素分析表明,该模型与数据拟合良好。结构方程模型显示,利特尔等人的测量方法与道奇和科伊开发的另一种主动和反应性攻击行为测量方法之间在预期方向上存在显著关联。进一步分析表明,利特尔等人的测量方法以及道奇和科伊的测量方法中的主动攻击子量表与行为问题显著相关。然而,利特尔等人的测量方法中的反应性攻击子量表与社会问题无关,而道奇和科伊的测量方法中的主动和反应性攻击子量表均与社会问题相关。