Hafner J, Botonakis I, Burg G
Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Zurich, Gloriastrasse 31, CH8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
Arch Dermatol. 2000 Jul;136(7):857-63. doi: 10.1001/archderm.136.7.857.
To study the interface pressure between the leg and 8 different multilayer bandage systems during postural changes, exercise (walking), and over 2 days of wear time.
Comparison of 8 different compression bandages under standardized conditions.
Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
A series of 10 healthy volunteers, 5 females and 5 males, aged 26 to 65 years.
An electropneumatic device was used to measure interface pressure at 12 points of the leg.
(1) Pressure changes from the standing to the sitting and supine position at rest, (2) pressure amplitude during exercise (200-m treadmill walk at 3.2 m/s, 0 degrees incline), and (3) pressure decrease over 2 days of wear time.
Results are given as median with the 10% to 90% confidence intervals. Multilayer bandages of short and medium stretch showed a larger pressure decrease when the patient was supine (eg, 3 short stretch bandages: 18.0 mm Hg [reference range, 15.5-19.5 mm Hg]) than systems of medium and long stretch bandages (eg, 4-layer bandage, 6.0 mm Hg [reference range, 4.5-7.0 mm Hg]) (P=.005). The amplitude of pressure waves during exercise was comparable among most multilayer bandage systems. The pressure loss over time was the smallest in elastic bandages (eg, 4-layer bandage, 6.0 mm Hg [reference range, 0.0-10.5 mm Hg]), compared with short stretch bandages (eg, 3 short stretch bandages, 18.0 mm Hg [reference range, 16.5-20.5 mm Hg]) (P=.005).
Highly elastic multilayer bandage systems showed the smallest pressure loss over several days, but the small pressure decrease when the patient was supine makes them potentially hazardous to patients with arterial occlusive disease. Short stretch bandages and the Unna boot with an inelastic zinc plaster bandage generate large pressure waves while walking and showed a marked pressure decrease when the patient was supine, but they lose a lot of their pressure within the first hours of wear. Multilayer systems composed of short stretch and cohesive medium stretch bandages represent a good compromise between elastic and inelastic bandage systems (moderate pressure loss over time, large pressure decrease on lying down). The clinical effectiveness of the different types of compression still remains to be studied.
研究8种不同的多层绷带系统在姿势改变、运动(行走)以及2天佩戴时间内腿部与绷带之间的界面压力。
在标准化条件下对8种不同的加压绷带进行比较。
瑞士苏黎世大学医院皮肤科。
10名健康志愿者,5名女性和5名男性,年龄在26至65岁之间。
使用电动气动装置测量腿部12个点的界面压力。
(1)休息时从站立位到坐位和仰卧位的压力变化;(2)运动期间(在3.2米/秒、0度坡度的跑步机上行走200米)的压力幅度;(3)2天佩戴时间内的压力下降情况。
结果以中位数及10%至90%置信区间表示。短拉伸和中拉伸的多层绷带在患者仰卧时压力下降幅度更大(例如,3种短拉伸绷带:18.0毫米汞柱[参考范围,15.5 - 19.5毫米汞柱]),而中拉伸和长拉伸绷带系统(例如,4层绷带,6.0毫米汞柱[参考范围,4.5 - 7.0毫米汞柱])压力下降幅度较小(P = 0.005)。大多数多层绷带系统在运动期间压力波的幅度相当。与短拉伸绷带(例如,3种短拉伸绷带,18.0毫米汞柱[参考范围,16.5 - 20.5毫米汞柱])相比,弹性绷带(例如,4层绷带,6.0毫米汞柱[参考范围,0.0 - 10.5毫米汞柱])随时间的压力损失最小(P = 0.005)。
高弹性多层绷带系统在数天内压力损失最小,但患者仰卧时压力下降较小,这对患有动脉闭塞性疾病的患者可能有潜在危害。短拉伸绷带和带有无弹性锌膏绷带的Unna靴在行走时会产生较大压力波,患者仰卧时压力明显下降,但在佩戴的最初几个小时内压力会大幅下降。由短拉伸和粘性中拉伸绷带组成的多层系统在弹性和非弹性绷带系统之间取得了良好的平衡(随时间压力损失适中,躺下时压力下降较大)。不同类型加压绷带的临床有效性仍有待研究。