• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

万维网上正畸信息的质量评估。

Quality evaluation of orthodontic information on the World Wide Web.

作者信息

Jiang Y L

机构信息

Center of Advanced Dental Education, Orthodontic Department, St. Louis, MO 63011, USA.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000 Jul;118(1):4-9. doi: 10.1067/mod.2000.104492.

DOI:10.1067/mod.2000.104492
PMID:10893465
Abstract

The phenomenal growth of the Internet has occurred because of the creation of the World Wide Web. The Web stores a huge amount of all sorts of health care information. It poses unlimited opportunities for people to access information. However, there is no central control and no regulatory policy regarding publication on the Web. The purpose of this study is to develop and apply published standards to perform a quality evaluation of orthodontic Web sites. Three hundred Web documents were visited and evaluated. The results indicate a variance of orthodontic information. The more professionally oriented information met more definitive standard criteria; on the contrary, the information designed for the general public met fewer standards.

摘要

互联网的显著发展得益于万维网的创建。网络存储了大量各类医疗保健信息。它为人们获取信息提供了无限机遇。然而,对于网络上的信息发布没有中央控制,也没有监管政策。本研究的目的是制定并应用已发布的标准,对正畸网站进行质量评估。访问并评估了300份网络文档。结果表明正畸信息存在差异。专业性更强的信息符合更多明确的标准;相反,面向普通大众的信息符合的标准较少。

相似文献

1
Quality evaluation of orthodontic information on the World Wide Web.万维网上正畸信息的质量评估。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000 Jul;118(1):4-9. doi: 10.1067/mod.2000.104492.
2
Quality analysis of patient information about knee arthroscopy on the World Wide Web.万维网上膝关节镜检查患者信息的质量分析
Arthroscopy. 2007 May;23(5):509-513.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.12.007.
3
Quality of Web-based information on cocaine addiction.关于可卡因成瘾的网络信息质量。
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Aug;72(2):336-41. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.03.002. Epub 2008 Apr 18.
4
MedIEQ-Quality labelling of medical web content using multilingual information extraction.MedIEQ——使用多语言信息提取对医学网络内容进行质量标注
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2006;121:183-90.
5
A quality evaluation methodology of health web-pages for non-professionals.一种针对非专业人士的健康网页质量评估方法。
Med Inform Internet Med. 2004 Jun;29(2):95-107. doi: 10.1080/14639230410001684396.
6
A framework for improving the quality of health information on the world-wide-web and bettering public (e-)health: the MedCERTAIN approach.一种提高万维网健康信息质量和改善公众(电子)健康的框架:MedCERTAIN方法。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2001;84(Pt 2):1450-4.
7
A systematic critique of diabetes on the world wide web for patients and their physicians.面向患者及其医生的关于万维网上糖尿病信息的系统评估。
Int J Med Inform. 2004 Sep;73(9-10):687-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2004.04.011.
8
[Quality of childhood brain tumour information on the Internet in French language].[法语互联网上儿童脑肿瘤信息的质量]
Bull Cancer. 2003 Jul;90(7):650-5.
9
Vaccines and Internet: characteristics of the vaccine safety net web sites and suggested improvements.疫苗与互联网:疫苗安全网网站的特点及改进建议
Vaccine. 2008 Dec 9;26(52):6950-5. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.09.093. Epub 2008 Oct 23.
10
Burns first aid information on the Internet.互联网上的烧伤急救信息。
Burns. 2006 Nov;32(7):897-901. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2006.02.020. Epub 2006 Sep 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Tools to Assess the Trustworthiness of Evidence-Based Point-of-Care Information for Health Care Professionals: Systematic Review.用于评估医疗保健专业人员基于证据的即时医疗信息可信度的工具:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jan 17;22(1):e15415. doi: 10.2196/15415.
2
Information on the Internet Regarding Orthognathic Surgery in Turkey: Is It an Adequate Guide for Potential Patients?互联网上有关土耳其正颌手术的信息:它对潜在患者来说是充分的指南吗?
Turk J Orthod. 2017 Sep;30(3):78-83. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2017.17027. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
3
Scatter Matters: Regularities and Implications for the Scatter of Healthcare Information on the Web.
散点问题:网络上医疗保健信息散点的规律及影响
J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2010 Apr 1;61(4):659-676. doi: 10.1002/asi.21217. Epub 2010 Jan 26.
4
Readability of ASPS and ASAPS educational web sites: an analysis of consumer impact.整形外科学会和整形外科学会教育网站的可读性:对消费者影响的分析。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Apr;125(4):1271-1278. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181d0ab9e.
5
Surfing the net for medical information about psychological trauma: an empirical study of the quality and accuracy of trauma-related websites.在网上搜索有关心理创伤的医学信息:一项关于创伤相关网站质量与准确性的实证研究。
Med Inform Internet Med. 2006 Sep;31(3):227-36. doi: 10.1080/14639230600887866.
6
Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish.互联网上的健康信息:英文和西班牙文的可及性、质量与可读性。
JAMA. 2001;285(20):2612-21. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.20.2612.