Saintonge P
Rech Soins Infirm. 2000 Mar(60):27-49.
Through a descriptive research, we wished to investigate the perception by the patients who underwent a cholecysectomy and by the caregivers, of the post-operative pain in its sociological dimension. The question of the research is as follows: How far is the post-operative pain perceived as stigmata by the patients who underwent a cholecysectomy and by the nurses? The reference framework is built up on the basis of a theoretical approach of cholecystectomy and of the notions of pain and stigmata. We carried out interviews with ten patients and ten nurses. The sample size does not enable a scientific use of the enquiry results. Pain, such as it is perceived by the majority of the patients, as normal and acceptable, does not seem to bring them into disrepute. Stigmatization appears in the relation caregiver-patient. It contributes to disturbing the flow of interactions between the patients and the nurses. When the nurses do not meet the expectations of the patients, they are no longer considered as "initiate" but as "normal". The affectivity arising in the relationship caregiver-patient, seems to have an influence in the management of post-operative pain.
通过一项描述性研究，我们希望调查接受胆囊切除术的患者及其护理人员对术后疼痛社会学层面的认知。该研究的问题如下：接受胆囊切除术的患者和护士在多大程度上认为术后疼痛是一种耻辱？参考框架是基于胆囊切除术的理论方法以及疼痛和耻辱的概念构建的。我们对10名患者和10名护士进行了访谈。样本量不足以科学地运用调查结果。大多数患者所感知到的正常且可接受的疼痛，似乎并未使他们蒙羞。耻辱感出现在护理人员与患者的关系中。它导致患者与护士之间的互动流程受到干扰。当护士未达到患者的期望时，他们不再被视为“内行”而是“普通人”。护理人员与患者关系中产生的情感，似乎对术后疼痛的管理有影响。
