Fradera X, Knegtel R M, Mestres J
Department of Molecular Design & Informatics, N.V. Organon, Oss, The Netherlands.
Proteins. 2000 Sep 1;40(4):623-36. doi: 10.1002/1097-0134(20000901)40:4<623::aid-prot70>3.0.co;2-i.
A similarity-driven approach to flexible ligand docking is presented. Given a reference ligand or a pharmacophore positioned in the protein active site, the method allows inclusion of a similarity term during docking. Two different algorithms have been implemented, namely, a similarity-penalized docking (SP-DOCK) and a similarity-guided docking (SG-DOCK). The basic idea is to maximally exploit the structural information about the ligand binding mode present in cases where ligand-bound protein structures are available, information that is usually ignored in standard docking procedures. SP-DOCK and SG-DOCK have been derived as modified versions of the program DOCK 4.0, where the similarity program MIMIC acts as a module for the calculation of similarity indices that correct docking energy scores at certain steps of the calculation. SP-DOCK applies similarity corrections to the set of ligand orientations at the end of the ligand incremental construction process, penalizing the docking energy and, thus, having only an effect on the relative ordering of the final solutions. SG-DOCK applies similarity corrections throughout the entire ligand incremental construction process, thus affecting not only the relative ordering of solutions but also actively guiding the ligand docking. The performance of SP-DOCK and SG-DOCK for binding mode assessment and molecular database screening is discussed. When applied to a set of 32 thrombin ligands for which crystal structures are available, SG-DOCK improves the average RMSD by ca. 1 A when compared with DOCK. When those 32 thrombin ligands are included into a set of 1,000 diverse molecules from the ACD, DIV, and WDI databases, SP-DOCK significantly improves the retrieval of thrombin ligands within the first 10% of each of the three databases with respect to DOCK, with minimal additional computational cost. In all cases, comparison of SP-DOCK and SG-DOCK results with those obtained by DOCK and MIMIC is performed.
本文提出了一种基于相似性驱动的灵活配体对接方法。给定位于蛋白质活性位点的参考配体或药效团,该方法允许在对接过程中纳入相似性项。已实现了两种不同的算法,即相似性惩罚对接(SP-DOCK)和相似性引导对接(SG-DOCK)。其基本思想是最大程度地利用在有配体结合蛋白结构的情况下存在的关于配体结合模式的结构信息,而这些信息在标准对接程序中通常被忽略。SP-DOCK和SG-DOCK是作为程序DOCK 4.0的修改版本推导而来的,其中相似性程序MIMIC作为一个模块,用于计算相似性指数,在计算的某些步骤校正对接能量得分。SP-DOCK在配体增量构建过程结束时对配体取向集应用相似性校正,对对接能量进行惩罚,因此仅对最终解决方案的相对排序有影响。SG-DOCK在整个配体增量构建过程中应用相似性校正,从而不仅影响解决方案的相对排序,还积极引导配体对接。讨论了SP-DOCK和SG-DOCK在结合模式评估和分子数据库筛选方面的性能。当应用于一组32个有晶体结构的凝血酶配体时,与DOCK相比,SG-DOCK将平均RMSD提高了约1 Å。当将这32个凝血酶配体纳入来自ACD、DIV和WDI数据库的1000个不同分子的集合中时,相对于DOCK,SP-DOCK显著提高了在三个数据库中每个数据库前10%内凝血酶配体的检索率,且计算成本增加最小。在所有情况下,都将SP-DOCK和SG-DOCK的结果与DOCK和MIMIC获得的结果进行了比较。