• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

知识引导对接:使用Surflex-Dock对新型配体的结合构型进行准确的前瞻性预测。

Knowledge-guided docking: accurate prospective prediction of bound configurations of novel ligands using Surflex-Dock.

作者信息

Cleves Ann E, Jain Ajay N

机构信息

Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2015 Jun;29(6):485-509. doi: 10.1007/s10822-015-9846-3. Epub 2015 May 5.

DOI:10.1007/s10822-015-9846-3
PMID:25940276
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4464052/
Abstract

Prediction of the bound configuration of small-molecule ligands that differ substantially from the cognate ligand of a protein co-crystal structure is much more challenging than re-docking the cognate ligand. Success rates for cross-docking in the range of 20-30 % are common. We present an approach that uses structural information known prior to a particular cutoff-date to make predictions on ligands whose bounds structures were determined later. The knowledge-guided docking protocol was tested on a set of ten protein targets using a total of 949 ligands. The benchmark data set, called PINC ("PINC Is Not Cognate"), is publicly available. Protein pocket similarity was used to choose representative structures for ensemble-docking. The docking protocol made use of known ligand poses prior to the cutoff-date, both to help guide the configurational search and to adjust the rank of predicted poses. Overall, the top-scoring pose family was correct over 60 % of the time, with the top-two pose families approaching a 75 % success rate. Correct poses among all those predicted were identified nearly 90 % of the time. The largest improvements came from the use of molecular similarity to improve ligand pose rankings and the strategy for identifying representative protein structures. With the exception of a single outlier target, the knowledge-guided docking protocol produced results matching the quality of cognate-ligand re-docking, but it did so on a very challenging temporally-segregated cross-docking benchmark.

摘要

预测与蛋白质共晶体结构的同源配体有很大差异的小分子配体的结合构型,比重新对接同源配体更具挑战性。交叉对接的成功率在20%-30%之间很常见。我们提出了一种方法,该方法利用特定截止日期之前已知的结构信息,对其结合结构后来才确定的配体进行预测。知识引导对接协议在一组十个蛋白质靶点上使用总共949个配体进行了测试。这个被称为PINC(“PINC不是同源的”)的基准数据集是公开可用的。蛋白质口袋相似性被用于选择用于整体对接的代表性结构。对接协议利用截止日期之前已知的配体构象,既有助于指导构象搜索,又能调整预测构象的排名。总体而言,得分最高的构象家族在超过60%的时间里是正确的,前两个构象家族的成功率接近75%。在所有预测的构象中,正确构象的识别率接近90%。最大的改进来自于利用分子相似性来改善配体构象排名以及识别代表性蛋白质结构的策略。除了一个异常的靶点外,知识引导对接协议产生的结果与同源配体重新对接的质量相当,但它是在一个极具挑战性的时间隔离交叉对接基准上做到这一点的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbbc/4464052/bd4d2f8b7c6a/10822_2015_9846_Fig17_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbbc/4464052/248694ca968b/10822_2015_9846_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbbc/4464052/09b8dde16353/10822_2015_9846_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbbc/4464052/3f2de702a5d8/10822_2015_9846_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbbc/4464052/4584eb500014/10822_2015_9846_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbbc/4464052/7d02cebed999/10822_2015_9846_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbbc/4464052/29cbeb8497a0/10822_2015_9846_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbbc/4464052/10cc1db5e6b2/10822_2015_9846_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbbc/4464052/2adc1540f1e6/10822_2015_9846_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbbc/4464052/ec0b4571de2c/10822_2015_9846_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbbc/4464052/f11f37d711e2/10822_2015_9846_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbbc/4464052/68d5106b4e18/10822_2015_9846_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbbc/4464052/4142e837536c/10822_2015_9846_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbbc/4464052/12c8d9f957fb/10822_2015_9846_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbbc/4464052/bad08528bb65/10822_2015_9846_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbbc/4464052/83d1d3d2d5e9/10822_2015_9846_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbbc/4464052/5799dd490fbc/10822_2015_9846_Fig16_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbbc/4464052/bd4d2f8b7c6a/10822_2015_9846_Fig17_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbbc/4464052/248694ca968b/10822_2015_9846_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbbc/4464052/09b8dde16353/10822_2015_9846_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbbc/4464052/3f2de702a5d8/10822_2015_9846_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbbc/4464052/4584eb500014/10822_2015_9846_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbbc/4464052/7d02cebed999/10822_2015_9846_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbbc/4464052/29cbeb8497a0/10822_2015_9846_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbbc/4464052/10cc1db5e6b2/10822_2015_9846_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbbc/4464052/2adc1540f1e6/10822_2015_9846_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbbc/4464052/ec0b4571de2c/10822_2015_9846_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbbc/4464052/f11f37d711e2/10822_2015_9846_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbbc/4464052/68d5106b4e18/10822_2015_9846_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbbc/4464052/4142e837536c/10822_2015_9846_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbbc/4464052/12c8d9f957fb/10822_2015_9846_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbbc/4464052/bad08528bb65/10822_2015_9846_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbbc/4464052/83d1d3d2d5e9/10822_2015_9846_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbbc/4464052/5799dd490fbc/10822_2015_9846_Fig16_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbbc/4464052/bd4d2f8b7c6a/10822_2015_9846_Fig17_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Knowledge-guided docking: accurate prospective prediction of bound configurations of novel ligands using Surflex-Dock.知识引导对接:使用Surflex-Dock对新型配体的结合构型进行准确的前瞻性预测。
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2015 Jun;29(6):485-509. doi: 10.1007/s10822-015-9846-3. Epub 2015 May 5.
2
Structure-based pose prediction: Non-cognate docking extended to macrocyclic ligands.基于结构的构象预测:非同源对接扩展到大环配体。
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2024 Oct 16;38(1):33. doi: 10.1007/s10822-024-00574-0.
3
Effects of protein conformation in docking: improved pose prediction through protein pocket adaptation.对接中蛋白质构象的影响:通过蛋白质口袋适配改进姿态预测。
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2009 Jun;23(6):355-74. doi: 10.1007/s10822-009-9266-3. Epub 2009 Apr 2.
4
Prospective evaluation of shape similarity based pose prediction method in D3R Grand Challenge 2015.基于形状相似性的姿态预测方法在2015年D3R大挑战中的前瞻性评估。
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2016 Sep;30(9):685-693. doi: 10.1007/s10822-016-9931-2. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
5
Nonlinear scoring functions for similarity-based ligand docking and binding affinity prediction.基于相似性的配体对接和结合亲和力预测的非线性评分函数。
J Chem Inf Model. 2013 Nov 25;53(11):3097-112. doi: 10.1021/ci400510e. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
6
Improved pose and affinity predictions using different protocols tailored on the basis of data availability.基于数据可用性定制不同协议,改进姿态和亲和力预测。
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2016 Sep;30(9):817-828. doi: 10.1007/s10822-016-9982-4. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
7
Boosted neural networks scoring functions for accurate ligand docking and ranking.用于精确配体对接和排序的增强神经网络评分函数。
J Bioinform Comput Biol. 2018 Apr;16(2):1850004. doi: 10.1142/S021972001850004X. Epub 2018 Feb 4.
8
Optimal strategies for virtual screening of induced-fit and flexible target in the 2015 D3R Grand Challenge.2015年D3R大挑战中诱导契合和柔性靶点虚拟筛选的优化策略
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2016 Sep;30(9):695-706. doi: 10.1007/s10822-016-9941-0. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
9
Exploring the Stability of Ligand Binding Modes to Proteins by Molecular Dynamics Simulations: A Cross-docking Study.通过分子动力学模拟探索配体与蛋白质结合模式的稳定性:一项交叉对接研究。
J Chem Inf Model. 2017 Oct 23;57(10):2514-2522. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00412. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
10
Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power.对多种蛋白质-配体复合物上的十种对接程序进行综合评估:采样能力和评分能力的预测准确性。
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2016 May 14;18(18):12964-75. doi: 10.1039/c6cp01555g. Epub 2016 Apr 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Structure-based pose prediction: Non-cognate docking extended to macrocyclic ligands.基于结构的构象预测:非同源对接扩展到大环配体。
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2024 Oct 16;38(1):33. doi: 10.1007/s10822-024-00574-0.
2
Bridging Structure- and Ligand-Based Virtual Screening through Fragmented Interaction Fingerprint.通过碎片化相互作用指纹连接基于结构和配体的虚拟筛选
ACS Omega. 2024 Sep 3;9(37):38957-38969. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.4c05433. eCollection 2024 Sep 17.
3
QSAR Study, Molecular Docking and Molecular Dynamic Simulation of Aurora Kinase Inhibitors Derived from Imidazo[4,5-]pyridine Derivatives.

本文引用的文献

1
Chemical and protein structural basis for biological crosstalk between PPARα and COX enzymes.PPARα与COX酶之间生物学相互作用的化学和蛋白质结构基础。
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2015 Feb;29(2):101-12. doi: 10.1007/s10822-014-9815-2. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
2
Prediction of off-target drug effects through data fusion.通过数据融合预测脱靶药物效应。
Pac Symp Biocomput. 2014;19:160-71.
3
A structure-guided approach for protein pocket modeling and affinity prediction.基于结构的蛋白口袋建模和亲和力预测方法。
基于咪唑并[4,5-]吡啶衍生物的极光激酶抑制剂的定量构效关系研究、分子对接及分子动力学模拟
Molecules. 2024 Apr 13;29(8):1772. doi: 10.3390/molecules29081772.
4
Novel Thiazolidinedione and Rhodanine Derivatives Regulate Glucose Metabolism, Improve Insulin Sensitivity, and Activate the Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated γ Receptor.新型噻唑烷二酮和若丹宁衍生物调节葡萄糖代谢、改善胰岛素敏感性并激活过氧化物酶体增殖物激活γ受体。
ACS Omega. 2024 Jan 25;9(5):5463-5484. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c07149. eCollection 2024 Feb 6.
5
Cosolvent Sites-Based Discovery of Protein Kinase G Inhibitors.基于共溶剂结合位点的蛋白激酶 G 抑制剂发现。
J Med Chem. 2022 Jul 28;65(14):9691-9705. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c02012. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
6
Chalcone Scaffolds Exhibiting Acetylcholinesterase Enzyme Inhibition: Mechanistic and Computational Investigations.查尔酮骨架具有乙酰胆碱酯酶抑制活性:机理和计算研究。
Molecules. 2022 May 16;27(10):3181. doi: 10.3390/molecules27103181.
7
5--(-Boc-l-Alanine)-Renieramycin T Induces Cancer Stem Cell Apoptosis via Targeting Akt Signaling.5-(-Boc-l-丙氨酸)-雷尼霉素 T 通过靶向 Akt 信号诱导肿瘤干细胞凋亡。
Mar Drugs. 2022 Mar 29;20(4):235. doi: 10.3390/md20040235.
8
Pongol Methyl Ether Inhibits Akt and Suppresses Cancer Stem Cell Phenotypes in Lung Cancer Cells.蓬戈尔甲醚抑制肺癌细胞中的Akt并抑制癌症干细胞表型。
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021 Oct 26;14(11):1085. doi: 10.3390/ph14111085.
9
QSAR analysis of 3-pyrimidin-4-yl-oxazolidin-2-one derivatives isocitrate dehydrogenase inhibitors using Topomer CoMFA and HQSAR methods.使用 Topomer CoMFA 和 HQSAR 方法对 3-嘧啶-4-基-恶唑烷-2-酮衍生物异柠檬酸脱氢酶抑制剂进行定量构效关系分析。
Mol Divers. 2022 Apr;26(2):1017-1037. doi: 10.1007/s11030-021-10222-6. Epub 2021 May 11.
10
Molecular modeling for potential cathepsin L inhibitor identification as new anti-photoaging agents from tropical medicinal plants.分子建模鉴定潜在组织蛋白酶 L 抑制剂作为热带药用植物的新型抗光老化剂。
J Bioenerg Biomembr. 2021 Jun;53(3):259-274. doi: 10.1007/s10863-021-09893-5. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2013 Nov;27(11):917-34. doi: 10.1007/s10822-013-9688-9. Epub 2013 Nov 9.
4
Protein function annotation by local binding site surface similarity.通过局部结合位点表面相似性进行蛋白质功能注释。
Proteins. 2014 Apr;82(4):679-94. doi: 10.1002/prot.24450. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
5
CSAR benchmark exercise 2011-2012: evaluation of results from docking and relative ranking of blinded congeneric series.CSAR 基准测试练习 2011-2012:对接结果评估和盲测同类系列的相对排名。
J Chem Inf Model. 2013 Aug 26;53(8):1853-70. doi: 10.1021/ci400025f. Epub 2013 May 10.
6
Docking performance of the glide program as evaluated on the Astex and DUD datasets: a complete set of glide SP results and selected results for a new scoring function integrating WaterMap and glide.在 Astex 和 DUD 数据集上评估的对接程序的对接性能:完整的 glide SP 结果集和新的整合了 WaterMap 和 glide 的打分函数的选定结果。
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2012 Jun;26(6):787-99. doi: 10.1007/s10822-012-9575-9. Epub 2012 May 11.
7
Evaluation of DOCK 6 as a pose generation and database enrichment tool.评估 DOCK 6 作为构象生成和数据库丰富工具的性能。
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2012 Jun;26(6):749-73. doi: 10.1007/s10822-012-9565-y. Epub 2012 May 9.
8
Lead Finder docking and virtual screening evaluation with Astex and DUD test sets.Lead Finder 对接和虚拟筛选评估与 Astex 和 DUD 测试集。
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2012 Jun;26(6):725-35. doi: 10.1007/s10822-012-9549-y. Epub 2012 May 9.
9
Docking and scoring with ICM: the benchmarking results and strategies for improvement.对接和评分与 ICM:基准测试结果和改进策略。
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2012 Jun;26(6):675-86. doi: 10.1007/s10822-012-9547-0. Epub 2012 May 9.
10
Surflex-Dock: Docking benchmarks and real-world application.Surflex-Dock:对接基准测试和实际应用。
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2012 Jun;26(6):687-99. doi: 10.1007/s10822-011-9533-y. Epub 2012 May 9.