Suppr超能文献

《女同性恋者、男同性恋者及其父母》:对拉萨拉及主流临床“智慧”的批判

"Lesbians, gay men, and their parents": a critique of LaSala and the prevailing clinical "wisdom".

作者信息

Green R J

机构信息

Alternative Family Project, California School of Professional Psychology, Alameda 94501, USA.

出版信息

Fam Process. 2000 Summer;39(2):257-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2000.39208.x.

Abstract

This article challenges the popular assumption that coming out to family of origin is important for lesbians and gay men's mental health and couple relationships. First, I present theory emphasizing the unique position of lesbians/gays in families of origin and the significance of "families of choice." Second, I review the quantitative research on social support received by lesbians/gays from family of origin, friends, and other social network sources. Third, I demonstrate how the dominant clinical opinion about coming out to family is based on an unwarranted use of theory developed for heterosexuals and on overgeneralization of findings from studies of white, upper-middle-class, North American lesbians/gays. Fourth, I propose five determinants of lesbian/gay persons' decisions to come out to family-of-origin members. Fifth, I argue that such decisions are constrained by "realistic" costs/benefits in various sociocultural niches rather than being a simple function of individuals' levels of differentiation. Lastly, I offer an expanded contextual stance for the family therapist working with lesbian/gay clients.

摘要

本文对一种流行的假设提出了质疑,该假设认为向原生家庭出柜对女同性恋者和男同性恋者的心理健康及伴侣关系很重要。首先,我阐述强调女同性恋者/男同性恋者在原生家庭中的独特地位以及“选择的家庭”的重要性的理论。其次,我回顾关于女同性恋者/男同性恋者从原生家庭、朋友及其他社会网络来源获得社会支持的定量研究。第三,我说明关于向家庭出柜的主流临床观点是如何基于对为异性恋者所发展的理论的无端运用以及对来自白人、中上层阶级、北美女同性恋者/男同性恋者研究结果的过度概括。第四,我提出女同性恋者/男同性恋者决定向原生家庭成员出柜的五个决定因素。第五,我认为此类决定受不同社会文化环境中的“现实”成本/收益的限制,而非仅仅取决于个体的分化程度。最后,我为与女同性恋/男同性恋客户合作的家庭治疗师提供一种更广阔的情境视角。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验