Beck R, Miller C D
Department of Psychology, Abilene Christian University, TX 79699, USA.
J Psychol. 2000 May;134(3):315-24. doi: 10.1080/00223980009600871.
The present study is an introduction to the construct of religious judgmentalism, defined as a willingness to make religious or moral judgments of others based on a limited period of observation; the study offers a prediction about which individuals will engage in such judgmental behavior. It was predicted that agency motives would significantly predict religious judgmentalism in a religious population but that communion motives and intrinsic religiosity would moderate this effect. Overall, the findings supported these predictions. Agency motives were positively correlated with religious judgmentalism. Intrinsic religiosity predicted a general unwillingness to make religious evaluations of others. Both intrinsic religiosity and communion motives did moderate the effects of high agency motives. Specifically, increases in communion motive and intrinsic religiosity, at high levels of agency motives, significantly predicted lower scores for religious judgmentalism. These findings were conceptualized as preliminary evidence for the position that interpersonal motives, rather than religiousness or religious motivation, predict social intolerance and criticism in religious individuals.
本研究介绍了宗教评判主义的概念,即基于有限的观察期对他人进行宗教或道德评判的意愿;该研究对哪些个体将参与此类评判行为进行了预测。研究预测,能动性动机将显著预测宗教群体中的宗教评判主义,但共融动机和内在宗教性将调节这种效应。总体而言,研究结果支持了这些预测。能动性动机与宗教评判主义呈正相关。内在宗教性预示着总体上不愿对他人进行宗教评价。内在宗教性和共融动机都对高能动性动机的效应起到了调节作用。具体而言,在高能动性动机水平下,共融动机和内在宗教性的增加显著预示着宗教评判主义得分较低。这些研究结果被视为一种初步证据,支持了这样一种观点,即人际动机而非宗教信仰或宗教动机能够预测宗教个体的社会不容忍和批评行为。