Cohen Adam B, Hall Daniel E, Koenig Harold G, Meador Keith G
Institute of Personality and Social Research, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-5050, USA.
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2005;9(1):48-61. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0901_4.
The traditional interpretation of "intrinsic" religiousness has fostered an unchallenged assumption that normative and substantive religious motivation is inherently individual and personal. Social motives for religiousness and structured practices have been characterized as "extrinsic" and as lacking in formative significance. We argue that this view is most applicable in American Protestant religions, and hence existing religious motivation scales reflect a distinctly American Protestant view. We then show that social motives and structured ritual practices are, in fact, as normative as individual motivations in several religious traditions. In particular, we describe the social practices and motives normative for Judaism and certain streams of Christianity. We then discuss the potential relevance of this analysis to emotion, collective identity, and moral judgment.
对“内在”宗教性的传统解释助长了一种未经质疑的假设,即规范性和实质性的宗教动机本质上是个体性和个人化的。宗教性的社会动机和结构化实践一直被视为“外在的”,且缺乏形成性意义。我们认为这种观点在美国新教宗教中最为适用,因此现有的宗教动机量表反映了一种明显的美国新教观点。然后我们表明,在几个宗教传统中,社会动机和结构化仪式实践实际上与个体动机一样具有规范性。特别是,我们描述了犹太教和某些基督教流派中具有规范性的社会习俗和动机。接着我们讨论了这一分析与情感、集体认同和道德判断的潜在相关性。