Redondo P, Pérez C M, Cox R A, Rivera C E
Department of Medicine, University of Puerto Rico School of Medicine, San Juan 00936-5067.
P R Health Sci J. 2000 Jun;19(2):99-105.
This study examined the clinical characteristics, risk factors, indications and post-intervention complications of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) submitted to either percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and/or stent placement versus isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
Several studies have examined the relative safety and outcome of patients submitted to those interventional procedures compared to CABG. Limited information is available regarding that subject in Puerto Rico.
We performed a retrospective analysis of the clinical, angiographic, operative, interventional, post-operative and post-interventional data of patients submitted to those procedures in our institution from January 1998 to August 1998. There were 53 patients in the interventional group and 206 patients in the CAGB group. Comparison of quantitative variables by procedure was based on Student t test or Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test; categorical variables were compared using Pearson's chi-square or Fisher's exact test.
There were no significant differences in age, body surface area, or cardiac risk factors. The most common pre-existing cardiovascular diagnosis was unstable angina. Three-vessel disease was the most common angiographic finding among CABG patients (61.7%). Two-vessel disease without left anterior descending coronary artery obstruction was significantly more common in the PTCA/Stent patients (58.5%). The vast majority (97.6%) of patients in the PTCA/Stent group and 52.4% of the CABG group had two-vessel intervention. A significantly higher frequency of complications occurred in the CABG group. However, the incidence of major complications, in both groups was not statistically different. Atrial arrhythmias were significantly more frequent in the CABG group.
A larger prospective study should be conducted in order to corroborate these preliminary findings and seek effective solution to any identifiable problem.
本研究探讨接受经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术(PTCA)和/或支架置入术与单纯冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的多支冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者的临床特征、危险因素、适应症及干预后并发症。
与CABG相比,已有多项研究探讨了接受这些介入手术患者的相对安全性和结局。在波多黎各,关于该主题的信息有限。
我们对1998年1月至1998年8月在本机构接受这些手术的患者的临床、血管造影、手术、介入、术后及干预后数据进行了回顾性分析。介入组有53例患者,CABG组有206例患者。按手术方式对定量变量进行比较采用Student t检验或Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon检验;分类变量采用Pearson卡方检验或Fisher精确检验进行比较。
年龄、体表面积或心脏危险因素方面无显著差异。最常见的既往心血管诊断是不稳定型心绞痛。三支血管病变是CABG患者中最常见的血管造影表现(61.7%)。在PTCA/支架置入患者中,无左前降支冠状动脉阻塞的双支血管病变明显更常见(58.5%)。PTCA/支架组绝大多数患者(97.6%)和CABG组52.4%的患者进行了双支血管干预。CABG组并发症发生率明显更高。然而,两组主要并发症的发生率无统计学差异。CABG组房性心律失常明显更常见。
应进行更大规模的前瞻性研究以证实这些初步发现,并寻求对任何可识别问题的有效解决方案。