Suppr超能文献

门诊环境中血管活性药物的间歇性输注:治疗后一年分析

Intermittent infusion of inotropes in the outpatient setting: one-year post treatment analysis.

作者信息

López-Candales A, Carron C, Graham S, Schwartz J

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Buffalo General Hospital, State University of New York, New York 14203, USA.

出版信息

P R Health Sci J. 2000 Jun;19(2):107-14.

Abstract

The course of patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III and IV and refractory heart failure symptoms is characterized by progressive clinical deterioration and frequent hospital readmissions. The value of intermittent intravenous administration of inotropes in managing this group of patients in the outpatient setting has been controversial. In this study, patients with refractory heart failure symptoms were enrolled to assess the impact of a multidisciplinary outpatient program in terms of on hospital admissions, emergency room visits, and interval free of symptoms after administration of inotropes. This is a retrospective analysis on 41 patients with refractory heart failure treated at our outpatient cardiac infusion unit over a 20 month period. Thirteen patients with a NYHA class III [age 64 +/- 13; LVEF 27 +/- 9%] and 28 patients with a NYHA class IV [age 65 +/- 13 years; LVEF 21 +/- 9%], mostly males, were included. A total of 65 admissions for decompensated HF were recorded in the previous 6-months prior to initiation of the outpatient program; compared to only 4 emergency room visits and 7 hospital admissions after enrollment. Furthermore, 17 patients have been discharged with improvement in NYHA class from 3.5 +/- 0.6 to 1.4 +/- 0.5. On these patients, the interval free of symptoms since the last infusion treatment has ranged from 201 to 489 days, without emergency room visits or hospital admissions for congestive heart failure. The results of this study support the use of intermittent infusion of inotropes in the outpatient setting. Although the natural history for patients with refractory heart failure has been grim; the use of these intermittent infusions may in fact alter the natural course of end stage congestive heart failure patients and deserves further investigation.

摘要

纽约心脏协会(NYHA)III级和IV级且有难治性心力衰竭症状的患者病程特点为临床症状进行性恶化且频繁住院。在门诊环境中,间歇性静脉注射强心剂对这类患者的治疗价值一直存在争议。在本研究中,纳入有难治性心力衰竭症状的患者,以评估多学科门诊项目对住院、急诊就诊以及强心剂给药后无症状间期的影响。这是一项对在我们门诊心脏输液单元接受治疗的41例难治性心力衰竭患者进行的回顾性分析。纳入了13例NYHA III级患者[年龄64±13岁;左心室射血分数(LVEF)27±9%]和28例NYHA IV级患者[年龄65±13岁;LVEF 21±9%],大多数为男性。在启动门诊项目前的前6个月共记录到65次失代偿性心力衰竭住院;相比之下,入组后仅有4次急诊就诊和7次住院。此外,17例患者出院时NYHA分级从3.5±0.6改善至1.4±0.5。对于这些患者,自上次输液治疗以来的无症状间期为201至489天,无急诊就诊或因充血性心力衰竭住院。本研究结果支持在门诊环境中使用间歇性强心剂输注。尽管难治性心力衰竭患者的自然病程严峻;但这些间歇性输注的使用实际上可能改变终末期充血性心力衰竭患者的自然病程,值得进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验