Wilson W R, Woods L A
Arch Otolaryngol. 1975 Feb;101(2):81-5. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1975.00780310003001.
Fifty children seen in an ENT clinic received the Bing and Rinne tuning fork tests, otoscopic examination, and puretone audiometry to determine the accuracy of the tuning fork tests in predicting otoscopic abnormality or conductive hearing loss. Neither tuning fork test showed high accuracy. The Bing test overidentified by yielding negative results (conductive loss) for many ears with normal hearing or sensorineural loss. It correctly identified conductive loss or otoscopic abnormality only slightly better than chance57% to 66% of the time. The Rinne test identified with high accuracy those ears with a 40 dB or greater air-bone gap. For air-bone gaps of 10-35 dB, only 27% of the ears gave negative results, meaning correct identification. However, when a negative Rinne occurred, the result was in error only 2% of the time.
在一家耳鼻喉科诊所就诊的50名儿童接受了宾氏和林内音叉试验、耳镜检查及纯音听力测定,以确定音叉试验在预测耳镜检查异常或传导性听力损失方面的准确性。两种音叉试验的准确性均不高。宾氏试验存在过度诊断的情况,许多听力正常或感音神经性听力损失的耳朵得出了阴性结果(传导性听力损失)。它正确识别传导性听力损失或耳镜检查异常的概率仅略高于随机概率,即57%至66%的时间。林内试验能高精度地识别气骨导差为40分贝或更大的耳朵。对于气骨导差为10至35分贝的耳朵,只有27%的结果为阴性,即识别正确。然而,当林内试验结果为阴性时,错误的概率仅为2%。