Swan I R, Browning G G
Department of Otolaryngology, University of Glasgow, Royal Infirmary, UK.
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1989 Dec;14(6):539-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.1989.tb00420.x.
The Bing test is based on the principle that occlusion of the external auditory meatus improves the perception of bone-conducted sounds unless there is a conductive hearing impairment. However, its sensitivity and specificity have not been reported. Tuning-fork and audiometric Bing tests were carried out on 126 patients with otological symptoms prior to any otological history or examination. Test results were compared with the pure tone air-bone gaps. The specificity and sensitivity of each test method was estimated. The tuning-fork Bing test was less sensitive than the audiometric Bing test, but had greater specificity. However, the Rinne test with the 256 Hz fork and the loudness comparison method was more sensitive than the Bing tuning-fork test, and had similar specificity. The Rinne is therefore the better test for clinical use.
除非存在传导性听力障碍,否则堵塞外耳道会改善骨导声音的感知。然而,其敏感性和特异性尚未见报道。在126例有耳科症状但无任何耳科病史或检查的患者中进行了音叉和听力测定宾氏试验。将试验结果与纯音气骨导差进行比较。估计了每种试验方法的特异性和敏感性。音叉宾氏试验比听力测定宾氏试验敏感性低,但特异性更高。然而,使用256赫兹音叉的林纳试验和响度比较法比宾氏音叉试验更敏感,且特异性相似。因此,林纳试验更适合临床使用。