• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

5至15岁儿童哮喘用酮替芬:一项随机安慰剂对照试验

Ketotifen for asthma in children aged 5 to 15 years: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.

作者信息

Kabra S K, Pandey R M, Singh R, Seth V

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi.

出版信息

Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2000 Jul;85(1):46-52. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62433-7.

DOI:10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62433-7
PMID:10923604
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The prophylactic agent ketotifen has been studied in mild-to-moderate asthma. Various trials showed benefit from 10 to 12 weeks of therapy, but no trial in children with followup beyond 12 weeks of the drug is available.

OBJECTIVES

We studied the efficacy of ketotifen, 1 mg twice a day, orally as a prophylactic drug in children with asthma.

METHODS

The double-blind, placebo-controlled trial studied 120 asthmatic children of either sex between the ages of 5 to 15 years at a tertiary care hospital. After an observation period of 4 weeks, children were randomly assigned to receive either ketotifen, 1 mg twice a day, or placebo for 6 months. Antiasthma drugs were continued as required. Main outcome measures included average duration for regular antiasthma drugs, average symptom scores, symptom free days, peak expiratory flow rate, FEV1, and need for emergency room visits.

RESULTS

Of the 120 children enrolled, 13 could not complete the trial. Thus 58 children remained in the treatment group and 49 were in the placebo group. Both groups were comparable in their baseline characteristics. The average number of days that required antiasthma drugs were significantly less in the treatment group: salbutamol (27+/-4.7 versus 37+/-3.5 P < .05), theophylline (37+/-4.7 versus 51+/-4.8 P < .05), oral steroids (2+/-0.4 versus 5+/-1.6 P < .05), and inhalation steroids (18+/-2.7 versus 16+/-10.8 P < .05). The average symptom scores and symptom free days for cough, wheeze, and breathlessness also favored the ketotifen group. Emergency room visits were also significantly lower in the ketotifen group (20 versus 10 P < .05). Statistically significant improvement in all the above parameters were observed after 14 weeks of therapy. The mean PEFR, FEV1 and side effects of medications were comparable between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Ketotifen, 1 mg twice a day, is an effective prophylaxis for asthma in children between 5 to 15 years. Significant clinical improvement is evident after 14 weeks of therapy.

摘要

背景

预防性药物酮替芬已在轻至中度哮喘中进行了研究。各种试验表明,10至12周的治疗有益,但尚无对使用该药物超过12周的儿童进行随访的试验。

目的

我们研究了每天口服两次、每次1毫克的酮替芬作为哮喘儿童预防性药物的疗效。

方法

这项双盲、安慰剂对照试验在一家三级护理医院对120名年龄在5至15岁之间的男女哮喘儿童进行了研究。经过4周的观察期后,儿童被随机分配接受每天两次、每次1毫克的酮替芬或安慰剂治疗6个月。根据需要继续使用抗哮喘药物。主要结局指标包括常规抗哮喘药物的平均使用时长、平均症状评分、无症状天数、呼气峰值流速、第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)以及急诊就诊需求。

结果

在登记的120名儿童中,13名无法完成试验。因此,治疗组有58名儿童,安慰剂组有49名儿童。两组的基线特征具有可比性。治疗组需要使用抗哮喘药物的平均天数显著更少:沙丁胺醇(27±4.7天对37±3.5天,P<.05)、茶碱(37±4.7天对51±4.8天,P<.05)、口服类固醇(2±0.4天对5±1.6天,P<.05)以及吸入性类固醇(18±2.7天对16±10.8天,P<.05)。咳嗽、喘息和呼吸急促的平均症状评分和无症状天数也有利于酮替芬组。酮替芬组的急诊就诊次数也显著更低(20次对10次,P<.05)。治疗14周后,上述所有参数均出现了统计学上的显著改善。两组之间的平均呼气峰值流速、第一秒用力呼气容积以及药物副作用具有可比性。

结论

每天两次、每次1毫克的酮替芬是5至15岁儿童哮喘的有效预防药物。治疗14周后,临床改善显著。

相似文献

1
Ketotifen for asthma in children aged 5 to 15 years: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.5至15岁儿童哮喘用酮替芬:一项随机安慰剂对照试验
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2000 Jul;85(1):46-52. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62433-7.
2
Prevention of recurrent wheezing in young children by loratadine compared with ketotifen.氯雷他定与酮替芬预防幼儿复发性喘息的比较
J Med Assoc Thai. 2009 Mar;92(3):351-5.
3
Ketotifen versus inhaled budesonide for controlling childhood asthma.酮替芬与吸入性布地奈德用于控制儿童哮喘的比较
J Med Assoc Thai. 2010 May;93(5):541-9.
4
Evaluation of ketotifen in the prophylactic treatment of bronchial asthma in children.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 1988 Jan-Feb;16(1):27-31.
5
A one-year double-blind clinical study of the efficacy and tolerability of picumast dihydrochloride versus ketotifen in patients with bronchial asthma.一项关于盐酸匹卡司特与酮替芬治疗支气管哮喘患者疗效及耐受性的为期一年的双盲临床研究。
Arzneimittelforschung. 1989 Oct;39(10A):1368-72.
6
The efficacy and safety of budesonide inhalation suspension: a nebulizable corticosteroid for persistent asthma in infants and young children.布地奈德吸入混悬液的疗效和安全性:一种用于婴幼儿持续性哮喘的可雾化吸入皮质类固醇。
Fam Med. 1999 May;31(5):337-45.
7
Prednisolone oral solution plus inhaled procaterol for acute asthma in children: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.泼尼松龙口服溶液加吸入用丙卡特罗治疗儿童急性哮喘:一项双盲随机对照试验。
Acta Paediatr Taiwan. 2007 Sep-Oct;48(5):257-62.
8
A 12-week, multicenter, randomized, partially blinded, active-controlled, parallel-group study of budesonide inhalation suspension in adolescents and adults with moderate to severe persistent asthma previously receiving inhaled corticosteroids with a metered-dose or dry powder inhaler.一项为期12周的多中心、随机、部分盲法、活性药物对照、平行组研究,旨在评估布地奈德吸入混悬液用于此前使用定量气雾剂或干粉吸入器吸入皮质类固醇治疗的中度至重度持续性哮喘青少年和成人患者的疗效。
Clin Ther. 2007 Jun;29(6):1013-26. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.06.005.
9
Effects of treatment with mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler in children with persistent asthma.糠酸莫米松干粉吸入器治疗持续性哮喘患儿的效果
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2006 Nov;97(5):672-80. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61099-X.
10
Efficacy and tolerability of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate versus montelukast in childhood asthma: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study.沙美特罗/丙酸氟替卡松与孟鲁司特治疗儿童哮喘的疗效和耐受性:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、双模拟、平行组研究。
Clin Ther. 2008 Aug;30(8):1492-504. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.07.018.

引用本文的文献

1
Phytochemistry and pharmacological activity of the genus artemisia.蒿属植物的化学与药理学活性。
Arch Pharm Res. 2021 May;44(5):439-474. doi: 10.1007/s12272-021-01328-4. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
2
A role for mast cells in geographic atrophy.肥大细胞在地图样萎缩中的作用。
FASEB J. 2020 Aug;34(8):10117-10131. doi: 10.1096/fj.202000807R. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
3
Enhancing the Safety and Efficacy of Food Allergy Immunotherapy: a Review of Adjunctive Therapies.增强食物过敏免疫治疗的安全性和疗效:辅助治疗的综述。
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2018 Oct;55(2):172-189. doi: 10.1007/s12016-018-8694-z.
4
Allergic lung inflammation promotes atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice.过敏性肺部炎症会促进载脂蛋白E缺乏小鼠的动脉粥样硬化。
Transl Res. 2016 May;171:1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2016.01.008. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
5
Interaction between allergic asthma and atherosclerosis.过敏性哮喘与动脉粥样硬化之间的相互作用。
Transl Res. 2016 Aug;174:5-22. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2015.09.009. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
6
Effect of ketotifen premedication on adverse reactions during peanut oral immunotherapy.酮替芬预处理对花生口服免疫治疗中不良反应的影响。
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2014 Jul 9;10(1):36. doi: 10.1186/1710-1492-10-36. eCollection 2014.
7
Comparative clinical evaluation of ketotifen and montelukast sodium in asthmatic Iraqi patients.哮喘伊拉克患者中酮替芬和孟鲁司特钠的临床对比评估。
Saudi Pharm J. 2010 Oct;18(4):245-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2010.07.001. Epub 2010 Jul 29.
8
Ketotifen alone or as additional medication for long-term control of asthma and wheeze in children.酮替芬单独使用或作为辅助药物用于长期控制儿童哮喘和喘息。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;2004(1):CD001384. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001384.pub2.
9
Long-term management of asthma.哮喘的长期管理
Indian J Pediatr. 2003 Jan;70(1):63-72. doi: 10.1007/BF02722747.
10
The effect of ketotifen on inflammatory markers in allergic conjunctivitis: an open, uncontrolled study.酮替芬对过敏性结膜炎炎症标志物的影响:一项开放性非对照研究。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2003 Jan 6;3:2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2415-3-2.