Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2018 Oct;55(2):172-189. doi: 10.1007/s12016-018-8694-z.
Food allergy is a potentially life-threatening condition with no approved curative therapy. A number of food allergen immunotherapies are being investigated in phase II/III trials; however, these are limited in their ability to restore immune tolerance to food allergens and often result in high rates of allergic side effects, sometimes involving anaphylaxis, that may curtail their impact. A variety of adjunctive therapies have been developed in order to enhance the efficacy and/or improve the safety of food allergen immunotherapy through either shifting the immune response from a Th2 polarized response to a Th1 and regulatory T cell dominated response or by blocking downstream effects of the allergic inflammatory response by targeting IgE or mast cell mediators. Upstream therapies that shift towards a Th1/Treg response include toll-like receptor (TLR) 4 agonists (e.g., MPL and GLA), TLR9 agonists (CpG oligonucleotides), nanoparticles encapsulating peanut allergen (with and without adjuvants, such as CpG or rapamycin), Chinese herbal medicine (food allergy herbal formula (FAHF-2)), probiotics, and interferon-gamma. In contrast, anti-IgE therapies such as omalizumab, anti-histamines like ketotifen, and leukotriene receptor antagonists all target the downstream allergic response. Anti-IgE-based therapies appear to be furthest along with probiotics, Chinese herbal medicines, and TLR-4 agonists currently in early phase clinical trials. Meanwhile, nanoparticles represent an innovative delivery vehicle for immunotherapy that could improve both efficacy and decrease allergic side effects. Furthermore, other biologic therapies directed towards the allergic immune response are on the horizon. A number of factors will need to be evaluated in comparing these treatments, including ability to decrease allergic adverse events, safety of the adjunctive therapies themselves, effect on long-term sustained unresponsiveness, and cost. Further phenotyping of food allergy patients may be necessary to determine which ones respond best to each therapy. However, with so many promising adjunctive therapies, it appears likely that clinicians will have a variety of options to optimize the administration of food allergen immunotherapy. We provided a review of these methods, their influence on allergic adverse events, and utility in improving the immunomodulatory effects of food allergen immunotherapy.
食物过敏是一种潜在的危及生命的疾病,目前尚无批准的治愈疗法。目前正在进行多项食物过敏原免疫治疗的 II/III 期临床试验;然而,这些治疗方法的能力有限,无法恢复对食物过敏原的免疫耐受,并且常常导致高比率的过敏副作用,有时甚至涉及过敏反应,这可能会限制它们的影响。为了提高食物过敏原免疫治疗的疗效和/或安全性,开发了各种辅助疗法,通过将免疫反应从 Th2 极化反应转变为 Th1 和调节性 T 细胞主导的反应,或者通过针对 IgE 或肥大细胞介质来阻断过敏炎症反应的下游效应。向 Th1/Treg 反应转变的上游疗法包括 Toll 样受体 (TLR) 4 激动剂(例如,MPL 和 GLA)、TLR9 激动剂(CpG 寡核苷酸)、包封花生过敏原的纳米颗粒(有和没有佐剂,如 CpG 或雷帕霉素)、中草药(食物过敏草药配方 (FAHF-2))、益生菌和干扰素-γ。相比之下,抗 IgE 疗法,如奥马珠单抗、抗组胺药酮替芬和白三烯受体拮抗剂,均靶向过敏的下游反应。目前,基于抗 IgE 的疗法似乎与益生菌、中草药和 TLR-4 激动剂一起处于早期临床试验阶段。与此同时,纳米颗粒代表了免疫治疗的一种创新给药载体,它可以提高疗效并减少过敏副作用。此外,针对过敏免疫反应的其他生物疗法也即将出现。在比较这些治疗方法时,需要评估许多因素,包括减少过敏不良事件的能力、辅助治疗本身的安全性、对长期持续无反应的影响以及成本。还需要对食物过敏患者进行进一步表型分析,以确定哪种疗法最适合他们。然而,有如此多有前途的辅助疗法,临床医生很可能会有多种选择来优化食物过敏原免疫治疗的管理。我们对这些方法进行了综述,包括它们对过敏不良事件的影响以及在改善食物过敏原免疫治疗的免疫调节作用方面的应用。