• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

酮替芬与吸入性布地奈德用于控制儿童哮喘的比较

Ketotifen versus inhaled budesonide for controlling childhood asthma.

作者信息

Tantichaiyakul Pavana, Preutthipan Aroonwan

机构信息

Division of Pediatrics, Banpong Hospital, Ratchaburi, Thailand.

出版信息

J Med Assoc Thai. 2010 May;93(5):541-9.

PMID:20524439
Abstract

BACKGROUND

International asthma guideline recommends inhaled corticosteroids therapy for children of all ages as the first controller. However, in some less developed parts of the world, ketotifen, an old inexpensive medicine with antihistaminic and anti-allergic reactions, has been found to be the most favored prophylactic agents.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of ketotifen and inhaled budesonide in asthmatic children aged 8 months to 14 years at Banpong Hospital, located 80 km south from Bangkok.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Children who had been admitted with acute asthmatic attack in 2008 at Banpong Hospital and had > 3 episodes of wheeze with good response to nebulized bronchodilators were randomized into two groups. Ketotifen group (n = 16) were given oral ketotifen 0.5 mg or 1 mg twice daily depending on age. Budesonide group (n = 14) were given as inhaled budesonide 200 microg (MDI) twice daily. Caregivers recorded children's asthmatic symptoms and nebulized treatments in diaries every day. The enrolled children received these two treatment regimens and were followed up for 26 weeks.

RESULTS

Number of ER visits decreased significantly after both treatments (p < 0.005). The percentage of children with reduction in ER visits was comparable between ketotifen and budesonide (p = 0.16). Ketotifen group also demonstrated a reduction in days of hospital stay (p < 0.05). Budesonide treatment resulted in more symptom-free days (p < 0.05). Both medications were well tolerated and safe. The only demonstrated side effect of ketotifen was weight gain. The growth rate in height for both groups did not differ.

CONCLUSION

Both ketotifen and inhaled budesonide are effective, safe, and well-tolerated in the prevention of asthma exacerbation in children particularly in the country with limited resource.

摘要

背景

国际哮喘指南推荐,吸入性糖皮质激素疗法适用于各年龄段儿童,作为首选控制药物。然而,在世界上一些欠发达地区,酮替芬,一种具有抗组胺和抗过敏反应的老药且价格低廉,已被发现是最受青睐的预防药物。

目的

在距离曼谷以南80公里的挽蓬医院,比较酮替芬和吸入用布地奈德对8个月至14岁哮喘儿童的疗效和安全性。

材料与方法

2008年在挽蓬医院因急性哮喘发作入院、喘息发作超过3次且对雾化支气管扩张剂反应良好的儿童被随机分为两组。酮替芬组(n = 16)根据年龄每日两次口服0.5毫克或1毫克酮替芬。布地奈德组(n = 14)每日两次吸入200微克布地奈德(定量气雾剂)。护理人员每天在日记中记录儿童的哮喘症状和雾化治疗情况。入选儿童接受这两种治疗方案,并随访26周。

结果

两种治疗后急诊就诊次数均显著减少(p < 0.005)。酮替芬组和布地奈德组急诊就诊次数减少的儿童百分比相当(p = 0.16)。酮替芬组住院天数也有所减少(p < 0.05)。布地奈德治疗导致无症状天数更多(p < 0.05)。两种药物耐受性良好且安全。酮替芬唯一显示的副作用是体重增加。两组身高生长速率无差异。

结论

酮替芬和吸入用布地奈德在预防儿童哮喘发作方面均有效、安全且耐受性良好,尤其是在资源有限的国家。

相似文献

1
Ketotifen versus inhaled budesonide for controlling childhood asthma.酮替芬与吸入性布地奈德用于控制儿童哮喘的比较
J Med Assoc Thai. 2010 May;93(5):541-9.
2
Ketotifen for asthma in children aged 5 to 15 years: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.5至15岁儿童哮喘用酮替芬:一项随机安慰剂对照试验
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2000 Jul;85(1):46-52. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62433-7.
3
Prevention of recurrent wheezing in young children by loratadine compared with ketotifen.氯雷他定与酮替芬预防幼儿复发性喘息的比较
J Med Assoc Thai. 2009 Mar;92(3):351-5.
4
Effectiveness of high repeated doses of inhaled budesonide or fluticasone in controlling acute asthma exacerbations in young children.高重复剂量吸入布地奈德或氟替卡松对控制幼儿急性哮喘发作的有效性。
J Asthma. 2008 Sep;45(7):561-7. doi: 10.1080/02770900802005251.
5
Comparative study of budesonide inhalation suspension and montelukast in young children with mild persistent asthma.布地奈德吸入混悬液与孟鲁司特治疗轻度持续性哮喘幼儿的对比研究
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Nov;120(5):1043-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.08.063.
6
A 12-week, multicenter, randomized, partially blinded, active-controlled, parallel-group study of budesonide inhalation suspension in adolescents and adults with moderate to severe persistent asthma previously receiving inhaled corticosteroids with a metered-dose or dry powder inhaler.一项为期12周的多中心、随机、部分盲法、活性药物对照、平行组研究,旨在评估布地奈德吸入混悬液用于此前使用定量气雾剂或干粉吸入器吸入皮质类固醇治疗的中度至重度持续性哮喘青少年和成人患者的疗效。
Clin Ther. 2007 Jun;29(6):1013-26. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.06.005.
7
Safety and tolerability of inhaled budesonide in children in the Steroid Treatment As Regular Therapy in early asthma (START) trial.吸入布地奈德在儿童中作为早期哮喘常规治疗的安全性和耐受性:类固醇治疗作为常规疗法(START)试验
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2006 May;17 Suppl 17:14-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-5562.2006.00380.x.
8
Beclomethasone dipropionate versus budesonide inhalation suspension in children with mild to moderate persistent asthma.丙酸倍氯米松与布地奈德吸入混悬液治疗轻度至中度持续性哮喘儿童的疗效比较
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2001 Jan-Feb;5(1):17-24.
9
[Efficacy of pulmicort suspension plus salbutamol and ipratropium bromide for management of acute asthma exacerbation in children: a comparative study].[布地奈德混悬液联合沙丁胺醇及异丙托溴铵治疗儿童急性哮喘发作的疗效:一项对比研究]
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2008 Mar;28(3):470-2.
10
Budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler versus inhaled corticosteroids alone in the treatment of asthma.布地奈德/福莫特罗单剂吸入器与单独吸入皮质类固醇治疗哮喘的比较
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2002 Nov;34(5):342-50. doi: 10.1002/ppul.10173.

引用本文的文献

1
Management of asthma in childhood: study protocol of a systematic evidence update by the Paediatric Asthma in Real Life (PeARL) Think Tank.儿童哮喘管理:儿科真实生活中的哮喘(PeARL)智库进行系统证据更新的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 2;11(7):e048338. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048338.