Singh N, Rogers P, Atwood C W, Wagener M M, Yu V L
Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000 Aug;162(2 Pt 1):505-11. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.162.2.9909095.
Inappropriate antibiotic use for pulmonary infiltrates is common in the intensive care unit (ICU). We sought to devise an approach that would minimize unnecessary antibiotic use, recognizing that a gold standard for the diagnosis of nosocomial pneumonia does not exist. In a randomized trial, clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS) (Pugin, J., R. Auckenthaler, N. Mili, J. P. Janssens, R. D. Lew, and P. M. Suter. Diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia by bacteriologic analysis of bronchoscopic and nonbronchoscopic "blind" bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 1991;143: 1121-1129) was used as operational criteria for decision-making regarding antibiotic therapy. Patients with CPIS </= 6 (implying low likelihood of pneumonia) were randomized to receive either standard therapy (choice and duration of antibiotics at the discretion of physicians) or ciprofloxacin monotherapy with reevaluation at 3 d; ciprofloxacin was discontinued if CPIS remained </= 6 at 3 d. Antibiotics were continued beyond 3 d in 90% (38 of 42) of the patients in the standard as therapy compared with 28% (11 of 39) in the experimental therapy group (p = 0.0001). In patients in whom CPIS remained </= 6 at the 3 d evaluation point, antibiotics were still continued in 96% (24 of 25) in the standard therapy group but in 0% (0 of 25) of the patients in the experimental therapy group (p = 0.0001). Mortality and length of ICU stay did not differ despite a shorter duration (p = 0.0001) and lower cost (p = 0.003) of antimicrobial therapy in the experimental as compared with the standard therapy arm. Antimicrobial resistance, or superinfections, or both, developed in 15% (5 of 37) of the patients in the experimental versus 35% (14 of 37) of the patients in the standard therapy group (p = 0.017). Thus, overtreatment with antibiotics is widely prevalent, but unnecessary in most patients with pulmonary infiltrates in the ICU. The operational criteria used, regardless of the precise definition of pneumonia, accurately identified patients with pulmonary infiltrates for whom monotherapy with a short course of antibiotics was appropriate. Such an approach led to significantly lower antimicrobial therapy costs, antimicrobial resistance, and superinfections without adversely affecting the length of stay or mortality.
在重症监护病房(ICU),针对肺部浸润不恰当地使用抗生素的情况很常见。我们认识到医院获得性肺炎的诊断尚无金标准,因此试图设计一种方法,以尽量减少不必要的抗生素使用。在一项随机试验中,临床肺部感染评分(CPIS)(Pugin, J., R. Auckenthaler, N. Mili, J. P. Janssens, R. D. Lew, and P. M. Suter. 通过支气管镜和非支气管镜“盲法”支气管肺泡灌洗 fluid 的细菌学分析诊断呼吸机相关性肺炎。《美国呼吸与危重症医学杂志》1991年;143: 1121 - 1129)被用作抗生素治疗决策的操作标准。CPIS≤6(意味着肺炎可能性低)的患者被随机分为接受标准治疗(抗生素的选择和疗程由医生自行决定)或环丙沙星单药治疗,并在3天时重新评估;如果3天时CPIS仍≤6,则停用环丙沙星。标准治疗组90%(42例中的38例)的患者抗生素使用持续超过3天,而试验治疗组为28%(39例中的11例)(p = 0.0001)。在3天评估点CPIS仍≤6的患者中,标准治疗组96%(25例中的24例)仍继续使用抗生素,而试验治疗组为0%(25例中的0例)(p = 0.0001)。尽管试验治疗组的抗菌治疗疗程较短(p = 0.0001)且成本较低(p = 0.003),但死亡率和ICU住院时间并无差异。试验组15%(37例中的5例)的患者出现了抗菌药物耐药、二重感染或两者皆有,而标准治疗组为35%(37例中的14例)(p = 0.017)。因此,抗生素过度治疗普遍存在,但对于ICU中大多数肺部浸润患者而言是不必要的。所采用的操作标准,无论肺炎的确切定义如何,都能准确识别出适合短疗程抗生素单药治疗的肺部浸润患者。这种方法显著降低了抗菌治疗成本、抗菌药物耐药性和二重感染的发生率,且对住院时间或死亡率没有不利影响。