Eid Mohamed H, Hambridge Kevin, Schofield Pat, Latour Jos M
Faculty of Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Critical Care and Emergency Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Nurs Crit Care. 2025 Jul;30(4):e13227. doi: 10.1111/nicc.13227. Epub 2025 Jan 2.
Endotracheal suction catheters are often used multiple times during endotracheal suctioning procedures in resource-limited intensive care units (ICU). The impact of this practice on mechanically ventilated patients' outcomes remains unclear.
The aim of this feasibility randomized controlled trial (fRCT) is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of single-use versus multiple-use endotracheal suction catheters flushed with chlorhexidine in mechanically ventilated ICU patients.
This study is a three-armed fRCT with an embedded qualitative study.
The trial involves three groups. One group includes endotracheal suctioning using a single-use catheter; the second group includes a multiple-use endotracheal suction catheter flushed with chlorhexidine and the control group includes a multiple-use endotracheal suction catheter flushed with normal saline. Sixty adult ICU patients (20 in each group) will be recruited, along with 12-16 ICU nurses delivering the interventions, and 12-16 patients' next-of-kin for semi-structured interviews. The study protocol has been approved by two ethics committees. Study recruitment will be conducted over an 8-month period with an expected start date of 12 April 2024.
The feasibility outcome measures will be recruitment, retention, and follow-up measures as well as the identification of clinical outcomes such as Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP) using the modified clinical pulmonary infection score, and ICU length-of-stay.
This study will help ICU nurses to understand how different methods of endotracheal suctioning affects patients in ICUs with limited resources. The findings could influence clinical practice and improve patient outcomes.
在资源有限的重症监护病房(ICU)进行气管内吸痰操作时,气管内吸痰导管常被多次使用。这种做法对机械通气患者预后的影响尚不清楚。
这项可行性随机对照试验(fRCT)的目的是评估在机械通气的ICU患者中,使用洗必泰冲洗的一次性与多次使用气管内吸痰导管的可行性和可接受性。
本研究是一项包含嵌入式定性研究的三臂fRCT。
该试验涉及三组。一组包括使用一次性导管进行气管内吸痰;第二组包括用洗必泰冲洗的多次使用气管内吸痰导管,对照组包括用生理盐水冲洗的多次使用气管内吸痰导管。将招募60名成年ICU患者(每组20名),以及12 - 16名实施干预措施的ICU护士,和12 - 16名患者的近亲进行半结构式访谈。研究方案已获得两个伦理委员会的批准。研究招募将在8个月内进行,预计开始日期为2024年4月12日。
可行性结果指标将包括招募、留存和随访指标,以及使用改良临床肺部感染评分等识别临床结局,如呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)和ICU住院时间。
本研究将帮助ICU护士了解不同的气管内吸痰方法如何影响资源有限的ICU中的患者。研究结果可能会影响临床实践并改善患者预后。