Suppr超能文献

在一项临床试验中,遵循医生开具的支气管扩张剂吸入器使用说明时欺骗行为的不可预测性。

Unpredictability of deception in compliance with physician-prescribed bronchodilator inhaler use in a clinical trial.

作者信息

Simmons M S, Nides M A, Rand C S, Wise R A, Tashkin D P

机构信息

UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1690, USA.

出版信息

Chest. 2000 Aug;118(2):290-5. doi: 10.1378/chest.118.2.290.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify subject characteristics that may be predictive of intentional dumping of metered-dose inhalers (MDIs) during a clinical trial.

DESIGN

Nebulizer Chronologs (NCs; Medtrac Technologies; Lakewood, CO), which record the date and time of each MDI actuation, were attached to the MDIs of participants who were given a prescribed medication schedule to follow in a clinical trial. Participants were not informed of the function of the NC or that their medication use was being monitored.

SETTING

The Lung Health Study, a 5-year clinical trial to evaluate the effect of intensive smoking cessation counseling and regular use of an inhaled bronchodilator on the progression of COPD.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred one smokers, 35 to 60 years of age, with mild to moderate airways obstruction enrolled in The Lung Health Study.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Thirty of these 101 participants (30%) actuated their inhalers > 100 times within a 3-h interval on at least one occasion during the first year of this 5-year trial. Only 1 of an additional 135 participants who had full foreknowledge of the MDI monitoring capability of the NC did so. Most of these dumping episodes occurred shortly before a clinic follow-up visit, suggesting an active attempt to hide noncompliance from the clinic staff. Whereas self-reported inhaler usage and canister weights were similar for the "dumpers" and "nondumpers," NC data indicated significantly lower compliance rates for dumpers (chi(2); p < 0.05). When demographic variables, treatment and clinic assignments, smoking status, pulmonary function test results, respiratory symptoms, and disease history of dumpers and nondumpers were analyzed, no predictors of dumping could be found.

CONCLUSIONS

Deception among noncompliers occurs frequently in clinical trials, is often not revealed by the usual methods of monitoring, and cannot be predicted by data readily available in clinical trials.

摘要

目的

确定在一项临床试验中可能预测定量吸入器(MDIs)故意丢弃情况的受试者特征。

设计

雾化器计时装置(NCs;Medtrac Technologies公司;科罗拉多州莱克伍德)被附着在参与一项临床试验且被给予规定用药计划的受试者的MDIs上,该装置可记录每次MDI启动的日期和时间。受试者未被告知NC的功能或其用药情况正在被监测。

背景

肺部健康研究,一项为期5年的临床试验,旨在评估强化戒烟咨询和定期使用吸入性支气管扩张剂对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)进展的影响。

受试者

101名年龄在35至60岁、患有轻度至中度气道阻塞的吸烟者参与了肺部健康研究。

测量与结果

在这项5年试验的第一年中,这101名受试者中有30名(30%)至少有一次在3小时内启动吸入器超过100次。在另外135名完全知晓NC对MDI监测能力的受试者中,只有1人这样做了。这些丢弃事件大多发生在诊所随访前不久,表明受试者积极试图向诊所工作人员隐瞒不依从情况。虽然“丢弃者”和“非丢弃者”自我报告的吸入器使用情况和药罐重量相似,但NC数据显示丢弃者的依从率显著较低(卡方检验;p<0.05)。当对丢弃者和非丢弃者的人口统计学变量、治疗和诊所分配、吸烟状况、肺功能测试结果、呼吸道症状和疾病史进行分析时,未发现丢弃行为的预测因素。

结论

在临床试验中,不依从者的欺骗行为经常发生,通常的监测方法往往无法发现,并且无法通过临床试验中 readily available的数据进行预测。 (注:原文“readily available”直译为“容易获得的”,这里结合语境意译为“现有的”更合适,但按要求未做修改)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验