• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

表面分割线索会影响对新形状和熟悉形状的负启动效应。

Surface segmentation cues influence negative priming for novel and familiar shapes.

作者信息

Loula F, Kourtzi Z, Shiffrar M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey 07102, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 Jul;26(4):929-44. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.26.4.929.

DOI:10.1037//0278-7393.26.4.929
PMID:10946372
Abstract

In a series of experiments, a negative priming paradigm was used to determine how the visual system represents novel shapes under conditions of inattention. Observers in a shape-matching task viewed overlapping shapes with or without surface segmentation cues. Positive priming occurred with opaque and transparent surface-like shapes, whereas negative priming was found with outlined and transparent shapes that lacked surface segmentation cues. This effect generalized to familiar shapes. These results support the importance of segmentation cues in negative priming and suggest that, under otherwise identical conditions, surface segmentation processes can determine whether positive or negative priming occurs in an implicit memory task. Thus, selective attention for overlapping shapes may be best understood in relation to surface segmentation processes.

摘要

在一系列实验中,采用负启动范式来确定视觉系统在注意力不集中的情况下如何表征新形状。在形状匹配任务中,观察者观看有无表面分割线索的重叠形状。对于不透明和透明的类似表面形状出现了正启动,而对于缺乏表面分割线索的轮廓形状和透明形状则发现了负启动。这种效应推广到了熟悉的形状。这些结果支持了分割线索在负启动中的重要性,并表明在其他条件相同的情况下,表面分割过程可以决定在隐性记忆任务中是出现正启动还是负启动。因此,对于重叠形状的选择性注意可能最好结合表面分割过程来理解。

相似文献

1
Surface segmentation cues influence negative priming for novel and familiar shapes.表面分割线索会影响对新形状和熟悉形状的负启动效应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 Jul;26(4):929-44. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.26.4.929.
2
An attention account of neural priming.神经启动效应的注意账户
Memory. 2017 Jul;25(6):856-864. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2016.1233283. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
3
Visual memory for novel shapes: implicit coding without attention.对新形状的视觉记忆:无需注意力的内隐编码。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1996 Jan;22(1):27-47. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.22.1.27.
4
Processing of shape defined by disparity in monkey inferior temporal cortex.猕猴颞下皮质中由视差定义的形状处理
J Neurophysiol. 2001 Feb;85(2):735-44. doi: 10.1152/jn.2001.85.2.735.
5
[Determinants of occurrence of negative priming for novel shapes with matching paradigm].
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2001 Aug;72(3):204-12. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.72.204.
6
Detecting shape change: characterizing the interaction between texture-defined and contour-defined borders.检测形状变化:表征纹理定义边界与轮廓定义边界之间的相互作用。
J Vis. 2013 Dec 16;13(14):12. doi: 10.1167/13.14.12.
7
Parafoveal information is not sufficient to produce semantic or visual priming.中央凹旁信息不足以产生语义或视觉启动效应。
Percept Psychophys. 1981 May;29(5):457-66. doi: 10.3758/bf03207359.
8
Do different perceptual task sets modulate electrophysiological correlates of masked visuomotor priming? Attention to shape and color put to the test.不同的知觉任务集是否会调节掩蔽视觉运动启动的电生理相关性?对形状和颜色的注意受到考验。
Psychophysiology. 2013 Feb;50(2):149-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01492.x. Epub 2012 Dec 13.
9
Illusory-contour figures prime matching of real shapes.错觉轮廓图形能促进对真实形状的匹配。
Perception. 2009;38(8):1118-31. doi: 10.1068/p6118.
10
Simply shapely: relative, not absolute shapes are primed in pop-out search.简单的形状:在弹出式搜索中,相对而非绝对的形状会被激活。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2013 Jul;75(5):845-61. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0433-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Inhibition of return lasts longer at repeatedly stimulated locations than at novel locations.返回抑制在重复刺激的位置比在新位置持续的时间更长。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Oct;13(5):896-901. doi: 10.3758/bf03194016.
2
Collinearity, curvature interpolation, and the power of perceptual integration.共线性、曲率插值与感知整合能力
Psychol Res. 2007 Jul;71(4):427-37. doi: 10.1007/s00426-005-0026-2. Epub 2005 Oct 8.
3
Negative priming and stimulus familiarity: what causes opposite results?
Mem Cognit. 2003 Apr;31(3):369-79. doi: 10.3758/bf03194395.