• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

An experimental study of strategy development.

作者信息

Newton E J, Roberts M J

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester, England.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2000 Jun;28(4):565-73. doi: 10.3758/bf03201247.

DOI:10.3758/bf03201247
PMID:10946540
Abstract

Three experiments are reported in which the strategy usage for a compass point directions task was investigated. For this task, people may use either an efficient cancellation strategy or an inefficient spatial strategy (see Roberts, Gilmore, & Wood, 1997). Experiment 1, together with Experiment 2, showed that users of cancellation are unlikely to have explicit prior knowledge of this strategy; instead they discover it as a result of experience with the task. Experiment 1 also showed that strategy selection is unlikely to be based on stylistic preferences, and that reducing the cognitive demands of the task does not increase the discovery of cancellation. Experiment 3 showed that evaluation of strategy validity is also of importance: Unsuccessful evaluation may prevent the selection of a newly discovered strategy, even if it is the more efficient method.

摘要

相似文献

1
An experimental study of strategy development.
Mem Cognit. 2000 Jun;28(4):565-73. doi: 10.3758/bf03201247.
2
Explaining inappropriate strategy selection in a simple reasoning task.解释简单推理任务中不恰当的策略选择。
Br J Psychol. 2007 Nov;98(Pt 4):627-44. doi: 10.1348/000712607X173763.
3
Sensible reasoning in two tasks: rule discovery and hypothesis evaluation.两项任务中的合理推理:规则发现与假设评估。
Mem Cognit. 1989 Mar;17(2):221-32. doi: 10.3758/bf03197071.
4
Individual differences in the encoding processes of egocentric and allocentric survey knowledge.自我中心和客观定向的调查知识编码过程中的个体差异。
Cogn Sci. 2013 Jan-Feb;37(1):176-92. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12005. Epub 2012 Oct 24.
5
Older and younger adults' strategies in approximate quantification.老年人和年轻人在近似量化方面的策略。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Sep;129(1):175-89. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.05.009. Epub 2008 Jul 7.
6
Effects of learning contexts on implicit and explicit learning.学习情境对内隐学习和外显学习的影响。
Mem Cognit. 1995 Nov;23(6):723-34. doi: 10.3758/bf03200925.
7
Speed and accuracy of accessing information in working memory: an individual differences investigation of focus switching.工作记忆中信息提取的速度与准确性:注意力转换的个体差异研究
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 May;34(3):616-30. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.3.616.
8
Warning: subtle aspects of strategy assessment may affect correlations among spatial tests.
Percept Mot Skills. 2007 Feb;104(1):123-40. doi: 10.2466/pms.104.1.123-140.
9
Spatial working memory load affects counting but not subitizing in enumeration.空间工作记忆负荷影响计数,但不影响枚举中的即时数数。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Aug;73(6):1694-709. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0135-5.
10
When you have to climb downhill to reach the top: the effect of action versus state orientation on solvinga goal-subgoal conflict in the Tower of Hanoi task.当你必须下山才能到达山顶:行动取向与状态取向对解决汉诺塔任务中目标-子目标冲突的影响。
Exp Psychol. 2014;61(5):394-401. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000260.

引用本文的文献

1
Dealing with indeterminacy in spatial descriptions.
Psychol Res. 2008 Sep;72(5):553-66. doi: 10.1007/s00426-007-0130-6. Epub 2007 Dec 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Invariants of human behavior.人类行为的不变量。
Annu Rev Psychol. 1990;41:1-19. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.000245.
2
Expert and exceptional performance: evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints.专家级和卓越表现:对任务限制最大程度适应的证据。
Annu Rev Psychol. 1996;47:273-305. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.47.1.273.
3
Constraints on learning in nonprivileged domains.非特权领域学习的限制。
Cogn Psychol. 1994 Oct;27(2):194-226. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1994.1016.
4
Four aspects of strategic change: contributions to children's learning of multiplication.战略变革的四个方面:对儿童乘法学习的贡献。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1995 Mar;124(1):83-97. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.124.1.83.
5
Individual differences in syllogistic reasoning: deduction rules or mental models?三段论推理中的个体差异:演绎规则还是心理模型?
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1986 Mar;115(1):16-25. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.115.1.16.