Munksgaard E C, Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E
Department of Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Eur J Oral Sci. 2000 Aug;108(4):341-5. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0722.2000.108004341.x.
Plasma arc light units for curing resin composites have been introduced with the claim of relatively short curing times. The purpose of the present study was to measure and compare elution of monomers from an experimental BisGMA-TEGDMA resin and a commercial resin composite when cured with a halogen unit and when cured with a plasma arc unit. Specimens of the materials were immersed in methanol, and the amounts of monomers released with time were analyzed by HPLC. By use of Fick's laws of diffusion, the amount of eluted monomers from the specimen at infinity was estimated. The elution from resin specimens and from resin composite specimens cured with the plasma arc light unit was 7 and 4 times higher, respectively, compared to the elution from specimens cured with the halogen unit. It was concluded that the plasma arc light curing unit did not provide optimal cure when used as recommended by the manufacturer.
用于固化树脂复合材料的等离子弧光装置已被引入,其宣称具有相对较短的固化时间。本研究的目的是测量并比较一种实验性双酚A缩水甘油醚-三乙二醇二甲基丙烯酸酯(BisGMA-TEGDMA)树脂和一种商用树脂复合材料在使用卤素装置固化以及使用等离子弧装置固化时单体的洗脱情况。将材料标本浸入甲醇中,并用高效液相色谱法(HPLC)分析随时间释放的单体量。通过使用菲克扩散定律,估算了无限时间内标本中洗脱单体的量。与用卤素装置固化的标本相比,用等离子弧光装置固化的树脂标本和树脂复合材料标本的洗脱量分别高出7倍和4倍。得出的结论是,按照制造商的建议使用时,等离子弧光固化装置并未提供最佳固化效果。