Farley A, Wruble L D, Humphries T J
Centre De Gastro-Enterologie et D'Endoscopie de Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2000 Aug;95(8):1894-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.02233.x.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of the proton pump inhibitor rabeprazole to that of the histamine-2 (H2)-receptor antagonist ranitidine in the treatment of erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease. The primary indicator of efficacy was the absence of esophageal erosions or ulcerations as determined by posttreatment endoscopy. Secondary indicators of efficacy included improvement in frequency and severity of daytime and nighttime heartburn. METHODS: A total of 338 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to therapy with rabeprazole 20 mg once daily in the morning or to ranitidine 150 mg four times daily. At baseline and at 4 wk, patients underwent endoscopy for evaluation of esophageal lesions. Patients whose lesions healed by wk 4 had therapy discontinued; others remained on therapy and had repeat endoscopy at 8 wk. Also recorded at study visits were patients' ratings of heartburn symptoms and overall sense of well being, patients' reports of time lost from daily activities, antacid use, and adverse events. Serum gastrin levels were measured and argyrophil enterochromaffin-like cell histology evaluated at baseline and when the patient ended therapy. RESULTS: At wk 4, healing was observed in 59% (98/167) of patients assigned to rabeprazole therapy, compared with 36% (60/169) of those receiving ranitidine (p < 0.001). By 8 wk, healing was seen in 87% (146/167) and 66% (112/169) of patients in the rabeprazole and ranitidine groups, respectively (p < 0.001). There were also significant differences between the two groups favoring rabeprazole with respect to resolution or improvement of heartburn symptoms and improvement in sense of well-being. No drug-related serious adverse events were seen with either therapy; fewer patients assigned to rabeprazole had treatment-emergent signs and symptoms. Serum gastrin levels increased over baseline in the rabeprazole group, but the mean value remained within normal limits. CONCLUSIONS: Rabeprazole was superior to ranitidine in esophageal healing and symptom relief in patients with erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease, and was equally well tolerated.
目的:本研究旨在比较质子泵抑制剂雷贝拉唑与组胺-2(H2)受体拮抗剂雷尼替丁治疗糜烂性胃食管反流病的疗效和安全性。疗效的主要指标是治疗后内镜检查确定食管无糜烂或溃疡。疗效的次要指标包括白天和夜间烧心频率及严重程度的改善。 方法:共纳入338例患者,随机分为两组,一组每天早晨服用20mg雷贝拉唑,另一组每天服用4次150mg雷尼替丁。在基线期和第4周时,患者接受内镜检查以评估食管病变。病变在第4周愈合的患者停止治疗;其他患者继续治疗,并在第8周再次进行内镜检查。在研究访视时还记录了患者烧心症状的评分和总体幸福感、患者报告的日常活动时间损失、抗酸剂使用情况及不良事件。在基线期和患者结束治疗时测量血清胃泌素水平,并评估嗜银性肠嗜铬样细胞组织学。 结果:在第4周时,接受雷贝拉唑治疗的患者中有59%(98/167)出现愈合,而接受雷尼替丁治疗的患者中这一比例为36%(60/169)(p<0.001)。到第8周时,雷贝拉唑组和雷尼替丁组患者的愈合率分别为87%(146/167)和66%(112/169)(p<0.001)。两组之间在烧心症状的缓解或改善以及幸福感的改善方面也存在显著差异,雷贝拉唑组更具优势。两种治疗均未出现与药物相关的严重不良事件;分配到雷贝拉唑组的患者出现治疗中出现的体征和症状的较少。雷贝拉唑组血清胃泌素水平高于基线,但平均值仍在正常范围内。 结论:在糜烂性胃食管反流病患者中,雷贝拉唑在食管愈合和症状缓解方面优于雷尼替丁,且耐受性相当。
Am J Gastroenterol. 1997-3
Am J Gastroenterol. 2002-6
Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2024-12
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-3-16
Gut Liver. 2017-1-15
World J Gastroenterol. 2013-12-7
Int J Clin Pharm. 2011-4-7
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2007-6
World J Gastroenterol. 2008-4-7