Niemann T, Madsen L G, Larsen S, Thorsgaard N
Medical Department, Herning Central Hospital, Denmark.
Int J Pancreatol. 2000 Jun;27(3):235-40. doi: 10.1385/ijgc:27:3:235.
Abdominal pain is the dominant symptom in 50-75% of patients with chronic pancreatitis, often requiring opioid analgesics. Fentanyl, a potent synthetic opioid, can be administered percutaneously at a constant dose and is claimed to have fewer systemic side effects.
To evaluate transdermal fentanyl plaster versus sustained release morphine tablets as analgesic treatment of painful chronic pancreatitis.
In an open randomized crossover trial, 18 patients were included. The treatment period was 4 wk for each drug. All patients had immediate-release morphine tablets as rescue medication.
The dosage of transdermal fentanyl had to be increased on average 50% over that indicated by the manufacturer. When this was done and rescue medication was secured, no difference between the two drugs in primary endpoint or patient preference was observed. There was also no difference in the secondary endpoints, pain control, and quality of life. However, skin side effects, mostly mild, occurred in 44% of the patients during treatment with transdermal fentanyl, and the mean daily dose of immediate release morphine was significantly higher during the transdermal fentanyl period than during the sustained-release morphine period (30.7 mg vs. 14.7 mg [p < 0.01]).
When given in an appropriate dose, transdermal fentanyl might be useful for treatment of some patients with painful chronic pancreatitis, e.g., when tablet ingestion is difficult. However, the dosage often has to be increased above that recommended by the manufacturer. The need of rescue morphine is considerable and skin side effects often occur. Transdermal fentanyl is, therefore, not the ideal first-choice analgesic in patients with painful chronic pancreatitis.
腹痛是50% - 75%慢性胰腺炎患者的主要症状,常需使用阿片类镇痛药。芬太尼是一种强效合成阿片类药物,可经皮恒定剂量给药,据称全身副作用较少。
评估透皮芬太尼贴剂与缓释吗啡片用于疼痛性慢性胰腺炎镇痛治疗的效果。
在一项开放随机交叉试验中,纳入了18例患者。每种药物的治疗期为4周。所有患者均备有即释吗啡片作为急救药物。
透皮芬太尼的剂量平均需比制造商指示的增加50%。当做到这一点并确保有急救药物时,两种药物在主要终点或患者偏好方面未观察到差异。在次要终点、疼痛控制和生活质量方面也没有差异。然而,44%的患者在使用透皮芬太尼治疗期间出现皮肤副作用,大多为轻度,且透皮芬太尼治疗期间即释吗啡的平均日剂量显著高于缓释吗啡治疗期间(30.7毫克对14.7毫克 [p < 0.01])。
给予适当剂量时,透皮芬太尼可能对一些疼痛性慢性胰腺炎患者有用,例如在难以吞服片剂时。然而剂量通常必须增加到制造商推荐剂量以上。急救吗啡的需求量很大,且经常出现皮肤副作用。因此,透皮芬太尼并非疼痛性慢性胰腺炎患者理想的首选镇痛药。