• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[初级预防筛查兴趣的决定因素]

[Determinants of interest in primary preventive screening].

作者信息

Fiala J, Brázdová Z

机构信息

Ustav preventivního lékarství LF MU, Brno.

出版信息

Cas Lek Cesk. 2000 May 24;139(10):299-304.

PMID:10953418
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Primary prevention care requires active approach not only from the health professionals but also from all individuals of the target population. People themselves have to be interested for their own health, for the preventive examinations, for their life-style. However, the health supporting activities based on the voluntary interest are most frequently exploited by people who actually do not need it, and people of the high risks stay apart. The aim of the study was to identify major differences among those who are interested in the preventive examinations and who are not, and answer the question whether those who declare their interest are the needful and primarily aimed population.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Within the preventive project, 4353 parents of school-aged children in Brno were examined using a special questionnaire. Beside interest in examination, following criteria were questioned and analysed: age, education level, economical standard, subjective evaluation of health, occurrence of concrete health problems, family health history, adequacy of the body weight (according reported height and weight), dietary habits, alcohol consumation, smoking habits, recreation-sport activities, and selected subjective perceptions. Differences based on concern about examination were evaluated by the comparison of studied parameters in groups formed according the "interest" and also using the logistic regression analysis. We found that the dominating determinant of concern about the preventive examination was the interest of the family partner (harmony of interests). In the group of persons who declared their "interest", higher education level, worse subjective evaluation of health, higher occurrence of concrete health problems, and higher incidence of selected diseases in the family were more frequently reported. Obversely, the number of smokers was lower in this group. Incidence of overweight persons differed according to their sex--meanwhile more overweight women were among the "interested group", more overweight men were among the "not interested". Women in the "interested" group consumed alcohol less frequently, men in this group were often more active in sports. Dietary habits as well as economical standard did not differ among the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Though the differences among groups with different concern about examination were statistically different, they were not very pronounced. It cannot be confirmed that the preventive examination is exploited preferably by people without major risk factors, those socio-demographically or otherwise specific, or generally those to whom the proposal of examination was not aimed.

摘要

背景

初级预防保健不仅需要卫生专业人员积极参与,目标人群中的所有个体也需如此。人们自身必须关注自身健康、预防性检查及生活方式。然而,基于自愿关注的健康支持活动,常被那些实际不需要的人利用,而高危人群却置身事外。本研究旨在确定对预防性检查感兴趣和不感兴趣的人群之间的主要差异,并回答宣称感兴趣的人群是否为真正有需求且主要目标人群这一问题。

方法与结果

在预防性项目中,使用一份特殊问卷对布尔诺4353名学龄儿童的家长进行了调查。除了对检查的兴趣外,还对以下标准进行了询问和分析:年龄、教育水平、经济状况、健康主观评价、具体健康问题的发生情况、家族健康史、体重是否合适(根据报告的身高和体重)、饮食习惯、饮酒情况、吸烟习惯、休闲运动活动以及某些主观认知。通过比较根据“兴趣”划分的组中研究参数,并使用逻辑回归分析,评估了基于对检查的关注程度的差异。我们发现,对预防性检查关注的主要决定因素是伴侣的兴趣(利益一致性)。在宣称“感兴趣”的人群中,报告显示更高的教育水平、更差的健康主观评价、更高的具体健康问题发生率以及家族中某些疾病的更高发病率更为常见。相反,该组中的吸烟者数量较少。超重者的发生率因性别而异——与此同时,“感兴趣组”中超重女性更多,“不感兴趣组”中超重男性更多。“感兴趣”组中的女性饮酒频率较低,该组中的男性通常更积极参与运动。两组之间的饮食习惯和经济状况没有差异。

结论

尽管对检查关注程度不同的组之间存在统计学差异,但并不十分显著。无法证实预防性检查更常被那些没有主要风险因素、社会人口统计学或其他方面特殊的人,或者通常来说检查建议并非针对的人所利用。

相似文献

1
[Determinants of interest in primary preventive screening].[初级预防筛查兴趣的决定因素]
Cas Lek Cesk. 2000 May 24;139(10):299-304.
2
Risks of different self-approach to health in an industrial city population.工业城市人口中不同自我保健方式的风险。
Cent Eur J Public Health. 2003 Sep;11(3):142-8.
3
A comparison between the lifestyles of men and women--parents of school age children.学龄儿童家长中男性与女性生活方式的比较。
Cent Eur J Public Health. 2000 May;8(2):94-100.
4
Dental screening and referral of young children by pediatric primary care providers.儿科初级保健提供者对幼儿进行牙科筛查和转诊。
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e642-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1269.
5
Cultural perceptions of healthy weight in rural Appalachian youth.阿巴拉契亚农村地区青少年对健康体重的文化认知。
Rural Remote Health. 2008 Apr-Jun;8(2):932. Epub 2008 May 22.
6
Pain among children and adolescents: restrictions in daily living and triggering factors.儿童和青少年的疼痛:日常生活中的限制及触发因素。
Pediatrics. 2005 Feb;115(2):e152-62. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0682.
7
[Suicidal attempts within the set of young adult parents of children observed in ELSPAC study].
Cas Lek Cesk. 2008;147(10):527-34.
8
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
9
The Brookline Early Education Project: a 25-year follow-up study of a family-centered early health and development intervention.布鲁克莱恩早期教育项目:一项以家庭为中心的早期健康与发展干预措施的25年随访研究。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jul;116(1):144-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2515.
10
Daily living with distress and enrichment: the moral experience of families with ventilator-assisted children at home.带着痛苦与充实生活:家中有使用呼吸机辅助的孩子的家庭的道德体验。
Pediatrics. 2006 Jan;117(1):e48-60. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0789.