Frost F J, Hurley J S, Petersen H V, Gunter M J, Gause D
Southwest Center for Managed Care Research, Lovelace Respiratory Research Institute, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87108, USA.
Epilepsia. 2000 Aug;41(8):1020-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.2000.tb00288.x.
Previous studies have estimated medical care costs of epilepsy by applying unit costs to estimated utilization or by summing costs for (a) ambulatory care and hospitalizations coded as epilepsy and (b) procedures and drugs specifically associated with the diagnosis or treatment of epilepsy. These methods may underestimate the cost of medical care for epilepsy. Two methods for estimating the medical care costs of epilepsy ("epilepsy-attributable cost method" and "case-control cost method") were compared.
The study population was 655 individuals with an epilepsy diagnosis enrolled in a managed care plan in the southwestern United States. The epilepsy-attributable costs were determined by summing costs for inpatient and outpatient encounters coded as epilepsy, procedures for the diagnosis or treatment of epilepsy, and drugs used to treat epilepsy. The case-control method determined costs by calculating the difference in total costs between cases and 1,965 age- and gender-matched controls.
The case-control epilepsy costs were $2,923 per case compared with epilepsy-attributable costs of $1,335 per case. The case-control method found statistically significant differences in costs between cases and controls for inpatient care, prescription drugs, and 8 of 11 categories of outpatient care. The largest contributors to the discrepancy between estimates were inpatient care, emergency department care, laboratory tests, and "other specialist" care.
Epilepsy-attributable costs accounted for only 46% of the total difference in costs between epilepsy cases and controls. Persons with epilepsy use more medical services than controls, but a substantial portion of this care is not coded to epilepsy.
以往的研究通过将单位成本应用于估计的利用率,或通过汇总以下各项成本来估算癫痫的医疗费用:(a) 编码为癫痫的门诊护理和住院费用,以及 (b) 与癫痫诊断或治疗具体相关的手术和药物费用。这些方法可能低估了癫痫的医疗费用。比较了两种估算癫痫医疗费用的方法(“癫痫归因成本法”和“病例对照成本法”)。
研究人群为美国西南部参加管理式医疗计划的655名癫痫诊断患者。癫痫归因成本通过汇总编码为癫痫的住院和门诊诊疗费用、癫痫诊断或治疗的手术费用以及用于治疗癫痫的药物费用来确定。病例对照法通过计算病例与1965名年龄和性别匹配的对照之间的总成本差异来确定成本。
病例对照法得出的癫痫患者人均成本为2923美元,而癫痫归因成本法得出的人均成本为1335美元。病例对照法发现,病例与对照在住院护理、处方药以及11类门诊护理中的8类护理费用上存在统计学上的显著差异。估计差异的最大促成因素是住院护理、急诊科护理、实验室检查和“其他专科”护理。
癫痫归因成本仅占癫痫病例与对照之间总成本差异的46%。癫痫患者比对照使用更多的医疗服务,但其中很大一部分护理未编码为癫痫相关。