Suppr超能文献

老年医疗保险受益人群中癫痫的经济影响及抗癫痫药物治疗不依从的成本

Economic impact of epilepsy and the cost of nonadherence to antiepileptic drugs in older Medicare beneficiaries.

作者信息

Ip Queeny, Malone Daniel C, Chong Jenny, Harris Robin B, Labiner David M

机构信息

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, 1295 N. Martin Ave, Campus PO Box: 210202, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.

Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, 1501 N Campbell Ave, Tucson, AZ 85724-5023, USA.

出版信息

Epilepsy Behav. 2018 Mar;80:208-214. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2018.01.009. Epub 2018 Feb 3.

Abstract

Epilepsy is most prevalent among older individuals, and its economic impact is substantial. The development of economic burden estimates that account for known confounders, and using percent incremental costs may provide meaningful comparison across time and different health systems. The first objective of the current study was to estimate the percent incremental healthcare costs and the odds ratio (OR) for inpatient utilization for older Medicare beneficiaries with epilepsy and without epilepsy. The second objective was to estimate the percent incremental healthcare costs and the OR for inpatient utilization associated with antiepileptic drug (AED) nonadherence among Medicare beneficiaries with epilepsy. The OR of inpatient utilization for cases compared with controls (i.e., non-cases) were 2.4 (95% CI 2.3 to 2.6, p-value<0.0001) for prevalent epilepsy and 3.6 (95% CI 3.2 to 4.0, p-value<0.0001) for incident epilepsy. With respect to total health care costs, prevalent cases incurred 61.8% (95% CI 56.6 to 67.1%, p-value<0.0001) higher costs than controls while incident cases incurred 71.2% (95% CI 63.2 to 79.5%, p-value <0.0001) higher costs than controls. The nonadherence rates were 33.6 and 32.9% for prevalent and incident cases, respectively. Compared to nonadherent cases, the OR of inpatient utilization for adherent prevalent cases was 0.66 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.81, p-value <0.0001). The cost saving for a prevalent case adherent to AEDs was 13.2% (95% CI 6.6 to 19.4%, p-value=0.0001) compared to a nonadherent case. An incident case adherent to AEDs spent 16.4% (95% CI 6.5 to 25.2%, p-value=0.002) less than a nonadherent incident case on health care. Epilepsy is associated with higher health care costs and utilization. Older Medicare beneficiaries with epilepsy incur higher total health care spending and have higher inpatient utilization than those without epilepsy. Total health care spending is less for older Medicare beneficiaries who have prevalent or incident epilepsy if they are adherent to AEDs.

摘要

癫痫在老年人中最为普遍,其经济影响巨大。考虑已知混杂因素的经济负担估计的发展,以及使用增量成本百分比可能会提供跨时间和不同卫生系统的有意义的比较。本研究的第一个目标是估计患有癫痫和未患有癫痫的老年医疗保险受益人的增量医疗保健成本百分比和住院使用的比值比(OR)。第二个目标是估计患有癫痫的医疗保险受益人中与抗癫痫药物(AED)不依从相关的增量医疗保健成本百分比和住院使用的OR。与对照组(即非病例组)相比,现患癫痫患者住院使用的OR为2.4(95%CI 2.3至2.6,p值<0.0001),新发病例癫痫患者住院使用的OR为3.6(95%CI 3.2至4.0,p值<0.0001)。关于总医疗保健成本方面,现患病例的成本比对照组高61.8%(95%CI 56.6至67.1%,p值<0.0001),而新发病例的成本比对照组高71.2%(95%CI 63.2至79.5%,p值<0.0001)。现患病例和新发病例的不依从率分别为33.6%和32.9%。与不依从病例相比,依从的现患病例住院使用的OR为0.66(95%CI 0.55至0.81,p值<0.0001)。与不依从病例相比,依从AEDs的现患病例成本节省13.2%(95%CI 6.6至19.4%,p值=0.0001)。依从AEDs的新发病例在医疗保健方面的花费比不依从的新发病例少16.4%(95%CI 6.5至2,5.2%,p值=0.002)。癫痫与更高的医疗保健成本和使用率相关。患有癫痫的老年医疗保险受益人比未患有癫痫的人产生更高额的总医疗保健支出,且住院使用率更高。对于患有现患或新发病例癫痫的老年医疗保险受益人,如果他们依从AEDs,总医疗保健支出会更低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验