Suppr超能文献

在大鼠中,与有害爪部压力相关的发声阈值会因异相睡眠剥夺而降低,并在睡眠恢复后升高。

Vocalization thresholds related to noxious paw pressure are decreased by paradoxical sleep deprivation and increased after sleep recovery in rat.

作者信息

Onen S H, Alloui A, Eschalier A, Dubray C

机构信息

Laboratoire de Pharmacologie Médicale, INSERM, EMI-HU 9904, 63001, Cedex 1, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

出版信息

Neurosci Lett. 2000 Sep 8;291(1):25-8. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(00)01383-5.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of paradoxical sleep deprivation (PSD) and sleep recovery on the vocalization threshold in rats submitted to a mechanical noxious stimulus. Sixteen male Wistar rats were randomly assigned in two groups: controls (n=8), paradoxical sleep deprived rats (n=8). PSD was performed using the 'inverted flower pot' technique. Paw pressure test was used to assess the sensitivity to mechanical noxious stimulus (vocalization threshold). The experiment was divided into three periods: baseline (day 1, day 2), PSD (day 3, day 4, day 5) and recovery (day 6, day 7, day 8, day 9). After 48 and 72 h of PSD, the vocalization thresholds decreased significantly in comparison to the control rats (day 4: 245+/-21 vs. 303+/-20 g, P=0.05; day 5: 256+/-17 vs. 324+/-22 g, P=0.02). In PSD group, relative to controls, vocalization thresholds increased significantly after 48, 72, and 96 h of recovery sleep periods (day 7: 378+/-24 vs. 307+/-8 g P=0.01; day 8: 384+/-27 vs. 316+/-23 g, P=0.02; day 9: 395+/-24 vs. 328+/-15 g, P=0.02). Vocalization thresholds on day 6 were not significantly different in both groups (375+/-20 vs. 324+/-24 g, P=0.08). In conclusion, experimental PSD in rats induces a significant decrease in vocalization threshold to mechanical noxious stimulus, which is totally reversed during the sleep recovery period.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估矛盾睡眠剥夺(PSD)和睡眠恢复对遭受机械性有害刺激的大鼠发声阈值的影响。16只雄性Wistar大鼠被随机分为两组:对照组(n = 8)和矛盾睡眠剥夺组(n = 8)。采用“倒置花盆”技术进行矛盾睡眠剥夺。使用爪子压力测试来评估对机械性有害刺激的敏感性(发声阈值)。实验分为三个阶段:基线期(第1天、第2天)、矛盾睡眠剥夺期(第3天、第4天、第5天)和恢复期(第6天、第7天、第8天、第9天)。在矛盾睡眠剥夺48小时和72小时后,与对照大鼠相比,发声阈值显著降低(第4天:245±21克vs. 303±20克,P = 0.05;第5天:256±17克vs. 324±22克)。

在矛盾睡眠剥夺组中,相对于对照组,在恢复睡眠期48小时、72小时和96小时后发声阈值显著升高(第7天:378±24克vs. 307±8克,P = 0.01;第8天:384±27克vs. 316±23克,P = 0.02;第9天:395±24克vs. 328±15克,P = 0.02)。两组在第6天的发声阈值无显著差异(375±20克vs. 324±24克,P = 0.08)。总之,大鼠实验性矛盾睡眠剥夺会导致对机械性有害刺激的发声阈值显著降低,而在睡眠恢复期这种降低会完全逆转。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验