Lings S, Leboeuf-Yde C
Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Denmark.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2000 Jul;73(5):290-7. doi: 10.1007/s004200000118.
A previous extensive review of the literature including that from the middle of 1992 concluded that whole-body vibrations may contribute to low back pain, but that the exposure-response relationship had not been clarified. We reviewed the literature of the past 7 years to find out: (i) whether there is evidence in the recent epidemiological literature for a causal association between whole-body vibrations and low back pain, and (ii) if there is evidence in the recent literature for a dose-response relationship between whole-body vibrations and low back pain.
All relevant epidemiological articles which were obtained through a search in the databases MEDLINE, OSH-ROM and TOXLINE, and through personal communication, were reviewed independently by the two authors, using a checklist.
Twenty-four original articles concerning the association between whole-body vibrations and the lower back were retained for use. The quality of the papers was mostly low, but improved with time. Only seven articles passed our predetermined quality criteria. Of the seven reports, one showed increased frequency of lumbar prolapse in occupational drivers, and six showed low back pain to be more frequent in whole-body vibration-exposed groups. Only two out of the four articles reporting on dose, showed a dose-response association.
Despite the lack of definite evidence, we found sufficient reasons for the reduction of whole-body vibration-exposure to the lowest possible level. If new knowledge is to be produced, good prospective studies with repeated measurements of exposure, analyses of work postures, and clear definitions and subgroupings of low back pain are needed. Other research in this field should be given up, and the resources used for more important issues, as the size of the problem of whole body vibration is probably on the decrease because of the technical prophylactic developments that are already in progress.
先前对包括1992年年中以来文献的广泛回顾得出结论,全身振动可能导致腰痛,但暴露-反应关系尚未明确。我们回顾了过去7年的文献,以查明:(i)近期流行病学文献中是否有证据表明全身振动与腰痛之间存在因果关联;(ii)近期文献中是否有证据表明全身振动与腰痛之间存在剂量-反应关系。
通过检索MEDLINE、OSH-ROM和TOXLINE数据库以及个人交流获得的所有相关流行病学文章,由两位作者使用检查表独立进行审查。
保留了24篇关于全身振动与下背部关联的原创文章以供使用。这些论文的质量大多较低,但随着时间推移有所提高。只有7篇文章通过了我们预先设定的质量标准。在这7份报告中,1份显示职业司机腰椎间盘突出症的发生率增加,6份显示全身振动暴露组中腰痛更为常见。在4篇报告剂量的文章中,只有2篇显示出剂量-反应关联。
尽管缺乏确凿证据,但我们找到了充分理由将全身振动暴露降低到尽可能低的水平。如果要产生新的知识,就需要进行良好的前瞻性研究,反复测量暴露情况,分析工作姿势,并明确界定腰痛并进行亚组划分。该领域的其他研究应该放弃,将资源用于更重要的问题,因为由于已经在进行的技术预防发展,全身振动问题的规模可能正在减小。