• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

简明纪念症状评估量表(MSAS-SF)。

The memorial symptom assessment scale short form (MSAS-SF).

作者信息

Chang V T, Hwang S S, Feuerman M, Kasimis B S, Thaler H T

机构信息

University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, New Jersey Medical School, Section Hematology/Oncology, VA New Jersey Health Care System at East Orange, 07018, USA.

出版信息

Cancer. 2000 Sep 1;89(5):1162-71. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20000901)89:5<1162::aid-cncr26>3.0.co;2-y.

DOI:10.1002/1097-0142(20000901)89:5<1162::aid-cncr26>3.0.co;2-y
PMID:10964347
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale Short Form (MSAS-SF), an abbreviated version of the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale, measures each of 32 symptoms with respect to distress or frequency alone. A physical symptom subscale (PHYS), psychologic symptom subscale (PSYCH), and global distress index (GDI) can be derived from the Short Form. We validated the MSAS-SF in a population of cancer patients.

METHODS

Two hundred ninety-nine cancer patients examined at the Section of Hematology/Oncology completed the MSAS-SF and the Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy (FACT-G). The Karnofsky performance status (KPS), extent of disease (EOD), and demographic data were assessed. The Cronbach alpha coefficient was used to assess internal reliability. MSAS-SF subscales were assessed against subscales of the FACT-G, the KPS, and EOD to determine criterion validity. Test-retest analysis was performed at 1 day and at 1 week.

RESULTS

The Cronbach alpha coefficients for the MSAS-SF subscales ranged from 0.76 to 0.87. The MSAS-SF subscales showed convergent validity with FACT subscales. Correlation coefficients were -0.74 (P < 0.001) for the PHYS and FACT-G physical well-being subscales, -0.68 (P < 0.001) for the PSYCH and FACT emotional well-being subscales, and -0.70 (P < 0.001) for GDI and FACT summary of quality-of-life subscales. The MSAS-SF subscales demonstrated convergent validity with performance status, inpatient status, and extent of disease. The test-retest correlation coefficients for the MSAS-SF subscales ranged from 0.86 to 0.94 at 1 day and from 0.40 to 0.84 for the 1 week group.

CONCLUSIONS

The MSAS-SF is a valid and easy to use instrument for symptom assessment.

摘要

背景

纪念症状评估量表简表(MSAS-SF)是纪念症状评估量表的缩写版本,仅针对痛苦程度或频率对32种症状进行逐一测量。可从该简表得出一个身体症状子量表(PHYS)、心理症状子量表(PSYCH)和总体痛苦指数(GDI)。我们在癌症患者群体中对MSAS-SF进行了验证。

方法

在血液学/肿瘤学部接受检查的299名癌症患者完成了MSAS-SF和癌症治疗功能评估量表(FACT-G)。评估了卡诺夫斯基功能状态(KPS)、疾病范围(EOD)和人口统计学数据。使用克朗巴哈α系数评估内部信度。将MSAS-SF子量表与FACT-G子量表、KPS和EOD进行对照评估,以确定效标效度。在1天和1周时进行重测分析。

结果

MSAS-SF子量表的克朗巴哈α系数在0.76至0.87之间。MSAS-SF子量表与FACT子量表显示出收敛效度。PHYS与FACT-G身体状况子量表的相关系数为-0.74(P < 0.001),PSYCH与FACT情感状况子量表的相关系数为-0.68(P < 0.001),GDI与FACT生活质量总结子量表的相关系数为-0.70(P < 0.001)。MSAS-SF子量表与功能状态、住院状态和疾病范围显示出收敛效度。MSAS-SF子量表在1天时的重测相关系数在0.86至0.94之间,1周组的重测相关系数在0.40至0.84之间。

结论

MSAS-SF是一种有效且易于使用的症状评估工具。

相似文献

1
The memorial symptom assessment scale short form (MSAS-SF).简明纪念症状评估量表(MSAS-SF)。
Cancer. 2000 Sep 1;89(5):1162-71. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20000901)89:5<1162::aid-cncr26>3.0.co;2-y.
2
Reliability and Validity of the Korean Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale-Short Form in Gynecological Cancer Patients.韩国纪念症状评估量表-简表在妇科癌症患者中的信度和效度。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Jan;55(1):101-107. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.08.023. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
3
Validation of the Simplified Chinese Version of the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale-Short Form Among Cancer Patients.癌症患者简明症状评估量表简体中文版的验证。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Jul;56(1):113-121. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.03.024. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
4
New insights in symptom assessment: the Chinese Versions of the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale Short Form (MSAS-SF) and the Condensed MSAS (CMSAS).症状评估的新见解:纪念症状评估量表简表(MSAS-SF)和精简版MSAS(CMSAS)的中文版
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2008 Dec;36(6):584-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.12.008. Epub 2008 Apr 22.
5
A comparison of three fatigue measures in veterans with cancer.癌症退伍军人三种疲劳测量方法的比较。
Cancer Invest. 2003 Jun;21(3):363-73. doi: 10.1081/cnv-120018227.
6
Validity and reliability of the Swedish version of the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS): an instrument for the evaluation of symptom prevalence, characteristics, and distress.《纪念症状评估量表(MSAS)瑞典语版的有效性和可靠性:用于评估症状发生率、特征和痛苦的工具》。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 Jul;46(1):131-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.07.023. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
7
Psychometric assessment of the MSAS-SF and the FACIT-Fatigue Scale in Spanish-speaking patients with cancer in Uruguay.乌拉圭讲西班牙语的癌症患者中MSAS-SF和FACIT-疲劳量表的心理测量评估。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 May;47(5):936-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.06.020. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
8
Validity of the memorial symptom assessment scale-short form psychological subscales in advanced cancer patients.纪念症状评估量表-简短形式心理分量表在晚期癌症患者中的有效性。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Nov;42(5):761-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.02.007. Epub 2011 May 6.
9
The memorial symptom assessment scale: modified for use in understanding family caregivers' perceptions of cancer patients' symptom experiences.纪念症状评估量表:为用于理解家庭照顾者对癌症患者症状体验的看法而修订。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2003 Jul;26(1):644-54. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(03)00205-7.
10
The clinical utility of Memorial Symptom Assessment-Short Form and Condensed Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale in Turkish lung cancer patients.纪念症状评估简表和精简版纪念症状评估量表在土耳其肺癌患者中的临床效用。
Clin Respir J. 2015 Apr;9(2):221-7. doi: 10.1111/crj.12127. Epub 2014 Mar 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Diet Habits, Smoking, and Alcohol Consumption Among Chinese Patients with Cancer.中国癌症患者的饮食习惯、吸烟与饮酒情况
Integr Cancer Ther. 2025 Jan-Dec;24:15347354251343004. doi: 10.1177/15347354251343004. Epub 2025 Jun 3.
2
Reduction of death anxiety in patients with advanced cancer in short-term psychotherapy.短期心理治疗降低晚期癌症患者的死亡焦虑
Front Psychol. 2025 Apr 2;16:1491734. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1491734. eCollection 2025.
3
Prognostic beliefs in patients with cancer receiving outpatient palliative care.
接受门诊姑息治疗的癌症患者的预后信念。
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Apr 12;33(5):377. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09404-x.
4
What is the evidence for dietary modification in the management and prevention of malignant bowel obstruction? A scoping review.饮食调整在恶性肠梗阻管理和预防中的证据有哪些?一项范围综述。
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Feb 27;33(3):231. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09279-y.
5
Development and testing of a videogame intervention for symptom management among 8-18 years old children with cancer: a study protocol.开发和测试一款视频游戏干预措施,以管理 8-18 岁癌症儿童的症状:一项研究方案。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2024 Oct 16;8(1):e002679. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002679.
6
Twenty-five years of experience with patient-reported outcome measures in soft-tissue sarcoma patients: a systematic review.软组织肉瘤患者报告结局测量 25 年的经验:系统评价。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Dec;33(12):3189-3211. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03755-4. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
7
Agreement between patient-reported and clinically documented symptoms of acute myeloid leukemia: Study protocol.急性髓系白血病患者报告症状与临床记录症状之间的一致性:研究方案。
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Apr;81(4):2214-2222. doi: 10.1111/jan.16320. Epub 2024 Jul 5.
8
Designing and Validating a Comprehensive Patient-Reported Outcomes Measure for Ambulatory Cancer Settings: The Revised Edmonton Symptom Assessment System for Cancer.设计并验证一种适用于门诊癌症患者的综合患者报告结局指标:修订版癌症埃德蒙顿症状评估系统
JCO Oncol Pract. 2024 Dec;20(12):1764-1775. doi: 10.1200/OP.24.00088. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
9
Relationships Between Socio-behavioral Factors and the Symptoms Among Asian American Breast Cancer Survivors: A Structural Equation Modeling.亚裔美国乳腺癌幸存者的社会行为因素与症状之间的关系:结构方程模型
Cancer Nurs. 2024 Apr 24. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000001354.
10
Acceptability and usefulness of the EORTC 'Write In three Symptoms/Problems' (WISP): a brief open-ended instrument for symptom assessment in cancer patients.EORTC“写入三个症状/问题”(WISP)的可接受性和有用性:一种用于癌症患者症状评估的简短开放式仪器。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024 Mar 26;22(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02244-z.