Suppr超能文献

输精管结扎术后的精液分析:何时进行以及进行几次?

Semen analysis after vasectomy: when and how many?

作者信息

Badrakumar C, Gogoi N K, Sundaram S K

机构信息

Pinderfields & Pontefract Hospitals NHS Trust, Wakefield, West Yorkshire, UK.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2000 Sep;86(4):479-81. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2000.00781.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess patient compliance for semen analysis after vasectomy, and to determine the timing and number of semen analyses required to confirm sterility.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study included 1321 men who underwent vasectomy between October 1995 and June 1998. They were followed up in two groups; in group 1 (one-test method) 961 consecutive patients were asked to provide a semen sample for analysis 4 months after vasectomy. Sterility was defined as the absence of sperm in one sample. If sperm were present in the sample, the test was repeated at monthly intervals until there were no sperm. In group 2 (two-test method) 360 consecutive patients were advised to provide semen samples 3 and 4 months after vasectomy. The absence of sperm in two consecutive samples was defined as the criterion to declare the man azoospermic. The presence of sperm in one sample required further samples every month until two consecutive azoospermic samples were produced.

RESULTS

In group 1, 810 patients provided semen samples, of which 783 (97%) had no sperm and the men were thus declared azoospermic. The remaining 27 (3%) samples contained sperm; six men withdrew from follow-up at various times but 21 patients produced a negative sample at some time within 7 months and were declared azoospermic. At the end of the follow-up, 804 (84%) patients had been declared azoospermic. In group 2, 294 (82%) patients provided a semen sample after 3 months but only 259 (72%) did so after 4 months. Of the patients providing the first sample, 287 (98%) were azoospermic, and after the second 252 (97%) were azoospermic. At the end of the follow-up 255 (71%) patients were declared azoospermic. There was no reported paternity in any of the men.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that compliance was better in group 1; when the patients in group 2 were asked to provide a second sample the compliance decreased significantly. The percentage of patients producing an azoospermic sample was similar for semen provided after 3 and 4 months. Thus, provided that the patient is adequately warned about the risk of failure of the vasectomy at any time during his life, a single semen analysis after 3 months is sufficient grounds for discontinuing other contraceptive precautions.

摘要

目的

评估输精管结扎术后患者进行精液分析的依从性,并确定确认不育所需的精液分析时间和次数。

患者与方法

本研究纳入了1995年10月至1998年6月期间接受输精管结扎术的1321名男性。他们被分为两组进行随访;在第1组(单次检测法)中,961名连续患者被要求在输精管结扎术后4个月提供精液样本进行分析。不育定义为一个样本中无精子。如果样本中存在精子,则每月重复检测一次,直至无精子。在第2组(两次检测法)中,360名连续患者被建议在输精管结扎术后3个月和4个月提供精液样本。连续两个样本中无精子被定义为判定该男性无精子症的标准。一个样本中存在精子则需要每月进一步提供样本,直至产生两个连续的无精子样本。

结果

在第1组中,810名患者提供了精液样本,其中783例(97%)无精子,这些男性因此被判定为无精子症。其余27例(3%)样本含有精子;6名男性在不同时间退出随访,但21例患者在7个月内的某个时间产生了阴性样本并被判定为无精子症。随访结束时,804例(84%)患者被判定为无精子症。在第2组中,294例(82%)患者在3个月后提供了精液样本,但4个月后只有259例(72%)这样做。提供第一个样本的患者中,287例(98%)为无精子症,第二个样本后252例(97%)为无精子症。随访结束时,255例(71%)患者被判定为无精子症。所有男性均未报告有亲子关系。

结论

这些结果表明第1组的依从性更好;当要求第2组患者提供第二个样本时,依从性显著下降。3个月和4个月后提供的精液产生无精子样本的患者百分比相似。因此,只要在患者一生中随时充分告知其输精管结扎失败的风险,术后3个月进行一次精液分析就足以停止采取其他避孕措施。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验