• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The Descriptive Assessment for Psychiatric Art (DAPA): update and further research.

作者信息

Hacking S, Foreman D

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Keele, Staffordshire, England.

出版信息

J Nerv Ment Dis. 2000 Aug;188(8):525-9. doi: 10.1097/00005053-200008000-00008.

DOI:10.1097/00005053-200008000-00008
PMID:10972572
Abstract

Painting and drawing is used as a treatment modality in psychiatry; however, assessments presently lack valid and reliable measures. We used the DAPA, a published quantitative measure of adult psychiatric artwork on a sample of painting produced in naturalistic conditions by 86 inpatients with four major categories of disabling psychiatric disorders and 23 controls. The replication was successful. Clear broad differences between psychiatric patients and controls and discrete differences in patient type can be differentiated when the conditions under which the patients produce their work are not controlled.

摘要

相似文献

1
The Descriptive Assessment for Psychiatric Art (DAPA): update and further research.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2000 Aug;188(8):525-9. doi: 10.1097/00005053-200008000-00008.
2
The descriptive assessment for psychiatric art. A new way of quantifying paintings by psychiatric patients.精神科艺术的描述性评估。一种量化精神科患者绘画作品的新方法。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1996 Jul;184(7):425-30. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199607000-00005.
3
Validity of the Severity of Psychiatric Illness rating scale in a sample of inpatients on a psychogeriatric unit.
Int Psychogeriatr. 1995 Fall;7(3):407-16. doi: 10.1017/s1041610295002158.
4
Re: using routinely collected clinical assessments in mental health services: the resident assessment instrument-mental health.关于:在心理健康服务中使用常规收集的临床评估:住院患者评估工具 - 心理健康
Can J Psychiatry. 2014 Jul;59(7):399-400. doi: 10.1177/070674371405900709.
5
Reliability of Andreasen's thought, language and communications disorder scale.安德烈亚森思维、语言和交流障碍量表的信度
Hillside J Clin Psychiatry. 1986;8(1):25-33.
6
Testing the comparability of psychiatric diagnoses in ICD-10 and DSM-III-R.测试《国际疾病分类第10版》(ICD - 10)与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第三版修订版》(DSM - III - R)中精神疾病诊断的可比性。
Psychopathology. 1994;27(1-2):19-28. doi: 10.1159/000284844.
7
[The "ideal" doctor from the view of psychiatric patients].[从精神科患者视角看“理想”医生]
Psychiatr Prax. 2010 Sep;37(6):279-84. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1248403. Epub 2010 Jun 15.
8
Reliability of the WAIS-R with psychiatric inpatients.韦氏成人智力量表修订版(WAIS-R)在精神科住院患者中的信度。
J Clin Psychol. 1992 Jan;48(1):72-6. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199201)48:1<72::aid-jclp2270480111>3.0.co;2-0.
9
Reliability of the MMPI-2 Subtle and Obvious scales with psychiatric inpatients.明尼苏达多项人格测验第二版(MMPI - 2)的微妙与明显量表在精神科住院患者中的信度
J Pers Assess. 1994 Apr;62(2):346-51. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6202_14.
10
A brief mental health outcome scale-reliability and validity of the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF).一种简短的心理健康结果量表——功能总体评定量表(GAF)的信度和效度
Br J Psychiatry. 1995 May;166(5):654-9. doi: 10.1192/bjp.166.5.654.