Sourjik V, Berg H C
Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, The Biological Laboratories, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Mol Microbiol. 2000 Aug;37(4):740-51. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.02044.x.
We prepared fusions of yellow fluorescent protein [the YFP variant of green fluorescent protein (GFP)] with the cytoplasmic chemotaxis proteins CheY, CheZ and CheA and the flagellar motor protein FliM, and studied their localization in wild-type and mutant cells of Escherichia coli. All but the CheA fusions were functional. The cytoplasmic proteins CheY, CheZ and CheA tended to cluster at the cell poles in a manner similar to that observed earlier for methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs), but only if MCPs were present. Co-localization of CheY and CheZ with MCPs was CheA dependent, and co-localization of CheA with MCPs was CheW dependent, as expected. Co-localization with MCPs was confirmed by immunofluorescence using an anti-MCP primary antibody. The motor protein FliM appeared as discrete spots on the sides of the cell. These were seen in wild-type cells and in a fliN mutant, but not in flhC or fliG mutants. Co-localization with flagellar structures was confirmed by immunofluorescence using an antihook primary antibody. Surprisingly, we did not observe co-localization of CheY with motors, even under conditions in which cells tumbled.
我们制备了黄色荧光蛋白(绿色荧光蛋白的YFP变体)与细胞质趋化蛋白CheY、CheZ和CheA以及鞭毛马达蛋白FliM的融合蛋白,并研究了它们在大肠杆菌野生型和突变体细胞中的定位。除了CheA融合蛋白外,其他融合蛋白均具有功能。细胞质蛋白CheY、CheZ和CheA倾向于在细胞两极聚集,其方式与早期观察到的甲基接受趋化蛋白(MCPs)类似,但前提是存在MCPs。正如预期的那样,CheY和CheZ与MCPs的共定位依赖于CheA,而CheA与MCPs的共定位依赖于CheW。使用抗MCP一抗通过免疫荧光证实了与MCPs的共定位。马达蛋白FliM在细胞侧面呈现为离散的斑点。在野生型细胞和fliN突变体中可见这些斑点,但在flhC或fliG突变体中则不可见。使用抗钩一抗通过免疫荧光证实了与鞭毛结构的共定位。令人惊讶的是,即使在细胞翻滚的条件下,我们也未观察到CheY与马达的共定位。