Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
J Bacteriol. 2011 Aug;193(15):3894-903. doi: 10.1128/JB.00426-11. Epub 2011 Jun 3.
Transfer of a phosphoryl group from autophosphorylated CheA (P-CheA) to CheY is an important step in the bacterial chemotaxis signal transduction pathway. This reaction involves CheY (i) binding to the P2 domain of P-CheA and then (ii) acquiring the phosphoryl group from the P1 domain. Crystal structures indicated numerous side chain interactions at the CheY-P2 binding interface. To investigate the individual contributions of the P2 side chains involved in these contacts, we analyzed the effects of eight alanine substitution mutations on CheA-CheY binding interactions. An F214A substitution in P2 caused ∼1,000-fold reduction in CheA-CheY binding affinity, while Ala substitutions at other P2 positions had small effects (E171A, E178A, and I216A) or no detectable effects (H181A, D202A, D207A, and C213A) on binding affinity. These results are discussed in relation to previous in silico predictions of hot-spot and anchor positions at the CheA-CheY interface. We also investigated the consequences of these mutations for chemotaxis signal transduction in living cells. CheA(F214A) was defective in mediating localization of CheY-YFP to the large clusters of signaling proteins that form at the poles of Escherichia coli cells, while the other CheA variants did not differ from wild-type (wt) CheA (CheA(wt)) in this regard. In our set of mutants, only CheA(F214A) exhibited a markedly diminished ability to support chemotaxis in motility agar assays. Surprisingly, however, in FRET assays that monitored receptor-regulated production of phospho-CheY, CheA(F214A) (and each of the other Ala substitution mutants) performed just as well as CheA(wt). Overall, our findings indicate that F214 serves as an anchor residue at the CheA-CheY interface and makes an important contribution to the binding energy in vitro and in vivo; however, loss of this contribution does not have a large negative effect on the overall ability of the signaling pathway to modulate P-CheY levels in response to chemoattractants.
磷酸基团从自磷酸化 CheA(P-CheA)转移到 CheY 是细菌趋化信号转导途径中的重要步骤。该反应涉及 CheY(i)结合到 P-CheA 的 P2 结构域,然后(ii)从 P1 结构域获得磷酸基团。晶体结构表明在 CheY-P2 结合界面存在许多侧链相互作用。为了研究参与这些接触的 P2 侧链的个体贡献,我们分析了八个丙氨酸取代突变对 CheA-CheY 结合相互作用的影响。P2 中的 F214A 取代导致 CheA-CheY 结合亲和力降低约 1000 倍,而其他 P2 位置的丙氨酸取代(E171A、E178A 和 I216A)或没有检测到对结合亲和力的影响(H181A、D202A、D207A 和 C213A)。这些结果与先前 CheA-CheY 界面热点和锚定位点的计算预测相关联。我们还研究了这些突变对活细胞中趋化信号转导的影响。CheA(F214A) 在介导 CheY-YFP 定位到形成于大肠杆菌细胞极的信号蛋白大聚集中存在缺陷,而其他 CheA 变体在这方面与野生型 (wt) CheA (CheA(wt)) 没有差异。在我们的突变体集中,只有 CheA(F214A) 在运动琼脂测定中表现出明显降低的支持趋化运动的能力。然而,令人惊讶的是,在监测受体调节的磷酸化 CheY 产生的 FRET 测定中,CheA(F214A)(和其他每个丙氨酸取代突变体)的表现与 CheA(wt) 一样好。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,F214 作为 CheA-CheY 界面的锚定残基,对体外和体内的结合能有重要贡献;然而,这种贡献的丧失对信号通路调节对趋化剂的 P-CheY 水平的整体能力没有大的负面影响。