Lillemoe K D, Melton G B, Cameron J L, Pitt H A, Campbell K A, Talamini M A, Sauter P A, Coleman J, Yeo C J
Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland 21287, USA.
Ann Surg. 2000 Sep;232(3):430-41. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200009000-00015.
To describe the management and outcome after surgical reconstruction of 156 patients with postoperative bile duct strictures managed in the 1990s.
The management of postoperative bile duct strictures and major bile duct injuries remains a challenge for even the most skilled biliary tract surgeon. The 1990s saw a dramatic increase in the incidence of bile duct strictures and injuries from the introduction and widespread use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Although the management of these injuries and short-term outcome have been reported, long-term follow-up is limited.
Data were collected prospectively on 156 patients treated at the Johns Hopkins Hospital with major bile duct injuries or postoperative bile duct strictures between January 1990 and December 1999. With the exception of bile duct injuries discovered and repaired during surgery, all patients underwent preoperative percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography and placement of transhepatic biliary catheters before surgical repair. Follow-up was conducted by medical record review or telephone interview during January 2000.
Of the 156 patients undergoing surgical reconstruction, 142 had completed treatment with a mean follow-up of 57.5 months. Two patients died of reasons unrelated to biliary tract disease before the completion of treatment. Twelve patients (7.9%) had not completed treatment and still had biliary stents in place at the time of this report. Of patients who had completed treatment, 90. 8% were considered to have a successful outcome without the need for follow-up invasive, diagnos tic, or therapeutic interventional procedures. Patients with reconstruction after injury or stricture after laparoscopic cholecystectomy had a better overall outcome than patients whose postoperative stricture developed after other types of surgery. Presenting symptoms, number of stents, interval to referral, prior repair, and length of postoperative stenting were not significant predictors of outcome. Overall, a successful outcome, without the need for biliary stents, was obtained in 98% of patients, including those requiring a secondary procedure for recurrent stricture.
Major bile duct injuries and postoperative bile duct strictures remain a considerable surgical challenge. Management with preoperative cholangiography to delineate the anatomy and placement of percutaneous biliary catheters, followed by surgical reconstruction with a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy, is associated with a successful outcome in up to 98% of patients.
描述20世纪90年代接受手术重建的156例术后胆管狭窄患者的治疗情况及结果。
即使是最熟练的胆道外科医生,术后胆管狭窄和主要胆管损伤的治疗仍是一项挑战。20世纪90年代,随着腹腔镜胆囊切除术的引入和广泛应用,胆管狭窄和损伤的发生率急剧上升。尽管已有关于这些损伤的治疗及短期结果的报道,但长期随访有限。
前瞻性收集1990年1月至1999年12月在约翰霍普金斯医院接受治疗的156例主要胆管损伤或术后胆管狭窄患者的数据。除手术中发现并修复的胆管损伤外,所有患者在手术修复前均接受了术前经皮肝穿刺胆管造影并放置经肝胆管导管。2岁时通过病历审查或电话访谈进行随访。
在接受手术重建的156例患者中,142例完成治疗,平均随访57.5个月。2例患者在完成治疗前死于与胆道疾病无关的原因。12例患者(7.9%)未完成治疗,在本报告发布时仍留有胆管支架。在完成治疗的患者中,90.8%被认为治疗成功,无需进行后续侵入性诊断或治疗干预程序。腹腔镜胆囊切除术后损伤或狭窄后进行重建的患者总体结果优于其他类型手术后出现术后狭窄的患者。出现的症状、支架数量、转诊间隔、先前的修复以及术后支架置入时间并非结果的显著预测因素。总体而言,98%的患者获得了无需胆管支架的成功结果,包括那些因复发性狭窄需要二次手术的患者。
主要胆管损伤和术后胆管狭窄仍是一项重大的外科挑战。术前胆管造影以明确解剖结构并放置经皮胆管导管,随后采用Roux-en-Y肝空肠吻合术进行手术重建,高达98%的患者可获得成功结果。