Ciancio S G, Mather M L, Bunnell H L
J Periodontol. 1975 Jul;46(7):397-401. doi: 10.1902/jop.1975.46.7.397.
This was a double-blind, radomized, crossover study of adult subjects to evaluate the effect of a test mouthrinse (Cepacol) on plaque accumulation. The study was divided into two parts, four weeks each, one in which only a mouthwash was used (part I) and the other in which a mouthwash and toothbrushing were used (part II). 1. The test mouthrinse produced a satistically significant reduction in dental plaque when compared to a placebo rinse. 2. The GI averaged approximately 1.0 throughout the study regardless of which mouthrinse was used. 3. A possible carryover effect of the test mouthrinse was noted. 4. A lower plaque score was seen in 67 to 75% of all patients during the period in which the test mouthrinse was used as compared to the placebo. 5. Ten subjects reported a burning sensation of the tongue with the test mouthrinse. No objective adverse effects were seen.
这是一项针对成年受试者的双盲、随机、交叉研究,旨在评估一种试验性漱口水(西吡氯铵含漱液)对牙菌斑积聚的影响。该研究分为两个部分,各为期四周,一部分仅使用漱口水(第一部分),另一部分同时使用漱口水和刷牙(第二部分)。1. 与安慰剂漱口水相比,试验性漱口水在统计学上能显著减少牙菌斑。2. 无论使用哪种漱口水,整个研究期间牙龈指数平均约为1.0。3. 注意到试验性漱口水可能存在残留效应。4. 与使用安慰剂相比,在使用试验性漱口水期间,67%至75%的患者牙菌斑评分较低。5. 十名受试者报告使用试验性漱口水后有舌部烧灼感。未观察到客观的不良反应。