Halpert A P, Pearson S D, LeWine H E, Mckean S C
Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates Division of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Am J Manag Care. 2000 May;6(5):549-55.
To evaluate an inpatient physician system initiated in June 1996 for all patients of a health maintenance organization admitted to the general medicine service of an urban teaching hospital. In the new program, attending physician duties were transferred from the patient's own general internist to another internist serving on a hospital-based rotation.
Cohort with historical controls.
We compared the following measures before and after the new inpatient physician program began: (1) hospital length of stay and total charges, (2) outcomes related to quality of care, (3) primary care physician satisfaction, and (4) housestaff satisfaction. Differences before and after initiation of the inpatient physician program were evaluated using multivariate analyses to adjust for patient differences and secular trends.
There were 2265 patients discharged from the general medical service in the year following implementation of the inpatient physician program. Postintervention average length of stay decreased from 3.5 to 3.0 days (P < .001). In multivariate analyses, average length of stay was reduced by 0.3 days (P = .008), and total hospital charges were reduced an average of $426 per admission (P = .001). In-hospital mortality rates, percentage of patients discharged home directly, and 30-day readmission rates did not change significantly in the postintervention period. Satisfaction among primary care physicians was high, with 90% of those answering a survey responding that they would recommend a similar program to other primary care groups. Medical housestaff satisfaction with their educational experience also increased.
Implementation of an inpatient physician program at this institution significantly decreased resource utilization while maintaining or improving quality of care. Satisfaction with the program was high among primary care internists and housestaff.
评估1996年6月为一家健康维护组织入住城市教学医院普通内科病房的所有患者启动的住院医师制度。在新方案中,主治医生的职责从患者自己的普通内科实习医生转移至在医院轮值的另一名内科实习医生。
有历史对照的队列研究。
我们比较了新的住院医师方案实施前后的以下指标:(1)住院时间和总费用,(2)与医疗质量相关的结果,(3)初级保健医生的满意度,以及(4)住院医生的满意度。使用多变量分析评估住院医师方案启动前后的差异,以调整患者差异和长期趋势。
在住院医师方案实施后的一年里,普通内科有2265名患者出院。干预后平均住院时间从3.5天降至3.0天(P <.001)。在多变量分析中,平均住院时间缩短了0.3天(P =.008),每次入院的总住院费用平均减少了426美元(P =.001)。干预后期间,院内死亡率、直接出院回家的患者百分比以及30天再入院率均无显著变化。初级保健医生的满意度很高,在回答调查的医生中,90%表示会向其他初级保健团队推荐类似方案。住院医生对其教育经历的满意度也有所提高。
该机构实施住院医师方案显著降低了资源利用,同时维持或提高了医疗质量。初级保健实习医生和住院医生对该方案的满意度很高。