Girmenia C, Tuccinardi C, Santilli S, Mondello F, Monaco M, Cassone A, Martino P
Dipartimento di Biotecnologie Cellulari ed Ematologia, University 'La Sapienza', Via Benevento 6, 00161 Rome, Italy.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2000 Sep;46(3):479-83. doi: 10.1093/jac/46.3.479.
We evaluated the activity of fluconazole and voriconazole against 83 Candida albicans isolates from patients with haematological malignancies, comparing the NCCLS microdilution method (M27-A) with a modified method with RPMI-2% glucose and MIC endpoint at 50% inhibition. Both drugs were highly active regardless of the year, the site of isolation of the strain and the test method employed. In several strains isolated during the last few years, trailing growth leading to difficulty in interpretation of the endpoint of the test has been observed for both drugs by the NCCLS method, but not by the modified method. In our experience, azole resistance of C. albicans is still not a clinical problem, however, the emerging phenomenon of the 'trailing effect' by the NCCLS method, even though resolvable by technical modifications, seems at least to indicate a reduction in the inhibitory activity of the azoles.
我们评估了氟康唑和伏立康唑对83株来自血液系统恶性肿瘤患者的白色念珠菌分离株的活性,将美国国立临床实验室标准化委员会(NCCLS)的微量稀释法(M27 - A)与采用RPMI - 2%葡萄糖且MIC终点为50%抑制率的改良方法进行了比较。无论年份、菌株的分离部位以及所采用的测试方法如何,两种药物均具有高活性。在过去几年分离出的几株菌株中,通过NCCLS方法观察到两种药物均出现拖尾生长现象,导致测试终点难以判断,但改良方法未出现此现象。根据我们的经验,白色念珠菌的唑类耐药性仍然不是一个临床问题,然而,NCCLS方法出现的“拖尾效应”这一新兴现象,即使可通过技术改进解决,似乎至少表明唑类药物的抑制活性有所降低。