Postma A
Psychological Laboratory, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 2, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Cognition. 2000 Nov 16;77(2):97-132. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(00)00090-1.
In this paper three theories of speech monitoring are evaluated. The perception-based approach proposes that the same mechanism employed in understanding other-produced language, the speech comprehension system, is also used to monitor one's own speech production. A conceptual, an inner, and an auditory loop convey information to a central, conscious monitor which scrutinizes the adequacy of the ongoing speech flow. In this model, only the end-products in the speech production sequences, the preverbal (propositional) message, the phonetic plan, and the auditory results, are verified. The production-based account assumes multiple local, autonomous monitoring devices, which can look inside formulation components. Moreover, these devices might be tuned to various signals from the actual speech motor execution, e.g. efferent, tactile, and proprioceptive feedback. Finally, node structure theory views error detection as a natural outflow of the activation patterns in the node system for speech production. Errors result in prolonged activation of uncommitted nodes, which in turn may incite error awareness. The approaches differ on the points of consciousness, volition and control, the number of monitoring channels, and their speed, flexibility, and capacity, and whether they can account for concurrent language comprehension disorders. From the empirical evidence presently available, it is argued for a central perception-based monitor, potentially augmented with a few automatic, production-based error detection devices.
本文对三种言语监测理论进行了评估。基于感知的方法提出,用于理解他人言语的相同机制,即言语理解系统,也被用于监测自己的言语产出。一个概念性循环、一个内部循环和一个听觉循环将信息传递给一个中央的、有意识的监测器,该监测器会仔细审查正在进行的言语流是否恰当。在这个模型中,只有言语产出序列中的最终产物,即言语前(命题)信息、语音计划和听觉结果,会得到验证。基于产出的观点假设有多个局部的、自主的监测装置,这些装置可以深入到言语表达成分内部。此外,这些装置可能会针对来自实际言语运动执行的各种信号进行调整,例如传出、触觉和本体感觉反馈。最后,节点结构理论将错误检测视为言语产出节点系统中激活模式的自然流出。错误会导致未被占用节点的激活延长,这反过来可能引发错误意识。这些方法在意识、意志和控制、监测通道的数量、速度、灵活性和容量,以及它们是否能够解释并发的语言理解障碍等方面存在差异。从目前可得的实证证据来看,有人主张存在一个基于中央感知的监测器,可能还会辅以一些自动的、基于产出的错误检测装置。