Suppr超能文献

倾听自我与观察舌尖:监控语义和语音言语错误的独特能力与大脑区域。

Listening to Yourself and Watching Your Tongue: Distinct Abilities and Brain Regions for Monitoring Semantic and Phonological Speech Errors.

机构信息

Center for Brain Plasticity and Recovery, Neurology Department, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC.

Rehabilitation Medicine Department, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC.

出版信息

J Cogn Neurosci. 2023 Jul 1;35(7):1169-1194. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02000.

Abstract

Despite the many mistakes we make while speaking, people can effectively communicate because we monitor our speech errors. However, the cognitive abilities and brain structures that support speech error monitoring are unclear. There may be different abilities and brain regions that support monitoring phonological speech errors versus monitoring semantic speech errors. We investigated speech, language, and cognitive control abilities that relate to detecting phonological and semantic speech errors in 41 individuals with aphasia who underwent detailed cognitive testing. Then, we used support vector regression lesion symptom mapping to identify brain regions supporting detection of phonological versus semantic errors in a group of 76 individuals with aphasia. The results revealed that motor speech deficits as well as lesions to the ventral motor cortex were related to reduced detection of phonological errors relative to semantic errors. Detection of semantic errors selectively related to auditory word comprehension deficits. Across all error types, poor cognitive control related to reduced detection. We conclude that monitoring of phonological and semantic errors relies on distinct cognitive abilities and brain regions. Furthermore, we identified cognitive control as a shared cognitive basis for monitoring all types of speech errors. These findings refine and expand our understanding of the neurocognitive basis of speech error monitoring.

摘要

尽管我们在说话时会犯很多错误,但人们仍然可以有效地进行交流,因为我们会监控自己的言语错误。然而,支持言语错误监控的认知能力和大脑结构尚不清楚。可能存在不同的能力和大脑区域,分别支持监测语音错误和语义错误。我们调查了与检测语音和语义言语错误相关的言语、语言和认知控制能力,这些能力涉及 41 名接受详细认知测试的失语症患者。然后,我们使用支持向量回归损伤症状映射,在 76 名失语症患者的组中识别支持检测语音与语义错误的大脑区域。结果表明,运动言语缺陷以及腹侧运动皮层的损伤与检测语音错误相对于语义错误的能力降低有关。检测语义错误与听觉词汇理解缺陷选择性相关。在所有错误类型中,较差的认知控制与检测能力降低有关。我们的结论是,语音和语义错误的监测依赖于不同的认知能力和大脑区域。此外,我们将认知控制确定为监测所有类型言语错误的共同认知基础。这些发现细化并扩展了我们对言语错误监测的神经认知基础的理解。

相似文献

2
Non-pharmacological interventions for improving language and communication in people with primary progressive aphasia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 29;5(5):CD015067. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015067.pub2.
3
Speech perception and language comprehension in primary progressive aphasia.
Cortex. 2024 Dec;181:272-289. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2024.10.010. Epub 2024 Nov 8.
5
Meaning for reading: the neurocognitive basis of semantic reading impairment after stroke.
Brain. 2025 Sep 3;148(9):3108-3120. doi: 10.1093/brain/awaf253.
7
A Comparison of Item Acquisition and Response Generalization for Semantic Versus Phonological Treatment of Aphasia.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2025 Apr 8;68(4):1821-1836. doi: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00304. Epub 2025 Feb 26.
8
Characteristics of drawing deficits in people with aphasia: Differences between symbolic and realistic drawn objects.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Jul-Aug;59(4):1269-1283. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12995. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
9
Cognitive decline assessment using semantic linguistic content and transformer deep learning architecture.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 May-Jun;59(3):1110-1127. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12973. Epub 2023 Nov 16.
10
I remembered the chorm! Word learning abilities of children with and without phonological impairment.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 May-Jun;59(3):913-931. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12967. Epub 2023 Oct 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Cortico-Cerebellar Monitoring of Speech Sequence Production.
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2024 Aug 15;5(3):701-721. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00113. eCollection 2024.
2
Rapid auditory and phonemic processing relies on the left planum temporale.
Res Sq. 2024 Apr 1:rs.3.rs-4189759. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4189759/v1.

本文引用的文献

1
Distinguishing semantic control and phonological control and their role in aphasic deficits: A task switching investigation.
Neuropsychologia. 2022 Aug 13;173:108302. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108302. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
2
Structural disconnection of the posterior medial frontal cortex reduces speech error monitoring.
Neuroimage Clin. 2022;33:102934. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102934. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
3
Impairment of speech auditory feedback error detection and motor correction in post-stroke aphasia.
J Commun Disord. 2021 Nov-Dec;94:106163. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2021.106163. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
4
Brain structures and cognitive abilities important for the self-monitoring of speech errors.
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2020;1(3):319-338. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00015. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
5
Cerebellar and Cortical Correlates of Internal and External Speech Error Monitoring.
Cereb Cortex Commun. 2021 May 31;2(2):tgab038. doi: 10.1093/texcom/tgab038. eCollection 2021.
6
Intellectual awareness of naming abilities in people with chronic post-stroke aphasia.
Neuropsychologia. 2021 Sep 17;160:107961. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107961. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
7
Modelling speech motor programming and apraxia of speech in the DIVA/GODIVA neurocomputational framework.
Aphasiology. 2021;35(4):424-441. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2020.1765307. Epub 2020 May 18.
9
The neurocognitive underpinnings of the Simon effect: An integrative review of current research.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2020 Dec;20(6):1133-1172. doi: 10.3758/s13415-020-00836-y. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验