Chelucci G L, Dall'Ava-Santucci J, Dhainaut J F, Chelucci A, Allegra A, Lockhart A, Zin W A, Milic-Emili J
Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Florence, Italy.
Intensive Care Med. 2000 Jul;26(7):870-7. doi: 10.1007/s001340051275.
To assess the effects of the association of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with different inflation volumes (V(T)'s) on passive lung deflation and alveolar recruitment in ARDS patients.
Clinical study using PEEP with two different V(T)'s and analyzing whether passive lung deflation and alveolar recruitment (Vrec) depend on end-inspired (EILV) or end-expired (EELV) lung volume in mechanically ventilated ARDS patients.
Medical intensive care unit in a university hospital.
Six mechanically ventilated consecutive supine patients with ARDS.
Time-course of thoracic volume decay during passive expiration and Vrec were investigated in six ARDS patients ventilated on PEEP with baseline V(T) (V(T),b) and 0.5V(T) (0.5V(T),b), and on zero PEEP (ZEEP) with V(T),b. Time constants of the fast (tau1) and slow (tau2) emptying compartments, as well as resistances and elastances were also determined.
(a) the biexponential model best fitted the volume decay in all instances. The fast compartment was responsible for 84+/-7 (0.5V(T),b) and 86+/-5% (V(T),b) on PEEP vs 81+/-6% (V(T),b) on ZEEP (P:ns) of the exhaled V(T), with tau1 of 0.50+/-0.13 and 0.58+/-0.17 s vs 0.35+/-0.11 s, respectively; (b) only tau1 for V(T),b on PEEP differed significantly (P < 0.02) from the one on ZEEP, suggesting a slower initial emptying; (c) for the same PEEP, Vrec was higher with a higher volume (V(T)b) than at a lesser one (0.5V(T),b), reflecting the higher V(T).
In mechanically ventilated ARDS patients: (a) the behavior of airway resistance seems to depend on the degree of the prevailing lung distension; (b) alveolar recruitment appears to be more important when higher tidal volumes are used during mechanical ventilation on PEEP; (c) PEEP changes the mechanical properties of the respiratory system fast-emptying compartment.
评估呼气末正压(PEEP)与不同潮气量(V(T))联合应用对急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者被动肺萎陷和肺泡复张的影响。
一项临床研究,使用两种不同V(T)的PEEP,并分析机械通气的ARDS患者中被动肺萎陷和肺泡复张(Vrec)是否取决于吸气末(EILV)或呼气末(EELV)肺容积。
大学医院的医学重症监护病房。
6例机械通气的仰卧位ARDS连续患者。
在6例ARDS患者中,研究了在PEEP下以基线V(T)(V(T),b)和0.5V(T)(0.5V(T),b)通气以及在零PEEP(ZEEP)下以V(T),b通气时,被动呼气期间胸壁容积衰减的时间过程和Vrec。还确定了快速排空腔室(tau1)和缓慢排空腔室(tau2)的时间常数以及阻力和弹性。
(a)双指数模型在所有情况下均最能拟合容积衰减。在PEEP下,快速腔室对呼出V(T)的贡献率在0.5V(T),b时为84±7%,在V(T),b时为86±5%,而在ZEEP下V(T),b时为81±6%(P:无显著差异),tau1分别为0.50±0.13秒和0.58±0.17秒,而在ZEEP下为0.35±0.11秒;(b)仅PEEP下V(T),b的tau1与ZEEP下的tau1有显著差异(P<0.02),表明初始排空较慢;(c)对于相同的PEEP,较高容积(V(T)b)时的Vrec高于较低容积(0.5V(T),b)时的Vrec,反映了较高的V(T)。
在机械通气的ARDS患者中:(a)气道阻力的行为似乎取决于当时肺膨胀的程度;(b)在PEEP机械通气期间使用较高潮气量时,肺泡复张似乎更为重要;(c)PEEP改变了呼吸系统快速排空腔室的力学特性。