van Lieshout L, Polderman A M, Deelder A M
Department of Parasitology, Leiden Univerity Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Acta Trop. 2000 Oct 23;77(1):69-80. doi: 10.1016/s0001-706x(00)00115-7.
In the present paper, we evaluate determination of circulating anodic (CAA) and cathodic (CCA) antigen for the diagnosis of an active Schistosoma infection in humans, in comparison to the diagnostic performance of parasitological examination and the demonstration of specific antibodies. Illustrated by three different studies, which all deal with the diagnosis of either recent or low intensity infections, we further discuss our experiences with these diagnostic methods. For the diagnosis of recent infections, specific antibody determination showed to be very sensitive, particularly in individuals originating from non-endemic areas. For the assessment of cure and for the diagnosis of active infections in endemic areas, the methods of choice are parasitological examination and CAA or CCA determination. Depending on infection levels of the target population and on logistic conditions, CAA and CCA determination may either replace parasitological examination or, in the case of light infections, may be used as a complementary diagnostic tool.
在本论文中,我们评估循环阳极抗原(CAA)和循环阴极抗原(CCA)检测在诊断人体活动性血吸虫感染方面的作用,并与寄生虫学检查及特异性抗体检测的诊断性能进行比较。通过三项不同的研究(均涉及近期感染或低强度感染的诊断)进行说明,我们进一步讨论了使用这些诊断方法的经验。对于近期感染的诊断,特异性抗体检测显示出很高的敏感性,尤其是在来自非流行地区的个体中。对于流行地区治疗效果的评估以及活动性感染的诊断,首选方法是寄生虫学检查和CAA或CCA检测。根据目标人群的感染水平和实际情况,CAA和CCA检测既可以替代寄生虫学检查,或者在轻度感染的情况下,也可以用作辅助诊断工具。