Garg K, Kemp J L, Wojcik D, Hoehn S, Johnston R J, Macey L C, Barón A E
Department of Radiology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of Colorado, 1055 Clermont St., Denver, CO 80220, USA.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Oct;175(4):997-1001. doi: 10.2214/ajr.175.4.1750997.
The purpose of this study was to compare combined CT pulmonary angiography and venography with leg sonography for accuracy and relative efficacy in diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis from the popliteal vein to the common femoral vein.
Seventy consecutive patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism underwent both combined CT pulmonary angiography and venography and bilateral leg sonography within 24 hr. CT venograms were analyzed independently in a blinded fashion for quality of venous opacification and patency by two observers. CT venography was compared with sonography for femoropopliteal vein thrombosis, and the final assessment based on multiple subjective and objective clinical and imaging criteria was recorded in three categories: 1, CT venography better than sonography; 2, CT venography equivalent to sonography; and 3, sonography better than CT venography.
Sixty-eight patients (97%) had a satisfactory or good quality CT venography examination. Two CT venography studies had false-positive findings due to flow artifacts. Both CT venography and sonography had positive findings for deep venous thrombosis in five patients, and both had negative findings in 63 patients (100% sensitivity, 97% specificity, 100% negative predictive value, and 71% positive predictive value). CT venography was better and more efficacious than sonography (category 1) in 25 patients (36%). CT venography was equivalent to sonography (category 2) in 26 patients (37%), and sonography was better than CT venography (category 3) in 19 patients (27%).
Compared with sonography, CT venography in addition to CT pulmonary angiography is a relatively accurate method for evaluation of femoropopliteal venous thrombosis. Combined CT pulmonary angiography and CT venography may be more efficacious than sonography or two separate examinations in selected patients.
本研究旨在比较联合CT肺动脉造影和静脉造影与腿部超声检查在诊断从腘静脉至股总静脉的深静脉血栓形成方面的准确性和相对有效性。
70例临床怀疑肺栓塞的连续患者在24小时内接受了联合CT肺动脉造影和静脉造影以及双侧腿部超声检查。两名观察者以盲法独立分析CT静脉造影,评估静脉造影剂充盈质量和通畅情况。将CT静脉造影与超声检查在股腘静脉血栓形成方面进行比较,并根据多种主观和客观临床及影像学标准进行最终评估,记录为三类:1,CT静脉造影优于超声检查;2,CT静脉造影与超声检查相当;3,超声检查优于CT静脉造影。
68例患者(97%)的CT静脉造影检查质量满意或良好。两项CT静脉造影研究因血流伪影出现假阳性结果。CT静脉造影和超声检查在5例患者中均发现深静脉血栓形成阳性结果,在63例患者中均为阴性结果(敏感性100%,特异性97%,阴性预测值100%,阳性预测值71%)。25例患者(36%)中,CT静脉造影比超声检查更好且更有效(第1类)。26例患者(37%)中,CT静脉造影与超声检查相当(第2类),19例患者(27%)中,超声检查优于CT静脉造影(第3类)。
与超声检查相比,除CT肺动脉造影外,CT静脉造影是评估股腘静脉血栓形成的一种相对准确的方法。对于部分患者,联合CT肺动脉造影和CT静脉造影可能比超声检查或两次单独检查更有效。