Duwe K M, Shiau M, Budorick N E, Austin J H, Berkmen Y M
Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, Milstein Hospital Bldg., 2nd Fl., Fort Washington Ave., New York, NY 10032, USA.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Dec;175(6):1525-31. doi: 10.2214/ajr.175.6.1751525.
In patients undergoing a combined CT angiographic and CT venographic protocol, the accuracy of helical CT venography for the detection of deep venous thrombosis was compared with that of lower extremity sonography.
Patients who had undergone a combined CT angiographic and CT venographic protocol and sonography of the lower extremities within 1 week were identified. The final reports were evaluated for the presence or absence of deep venous thrombosis. Statistical measures for the identification of deep venous thrombosis with helical CT venography were calculated. In each true-positive case, the location of the thrombus identified with both techniques was compared. All false-positive and false-negative cases were reviewed to identify the reasons for the discrepancies.
Seventy-four patients were included. There were eight patients (11%) with true-positive findings, 61 patients (82%) with true-negative findings, four patients (5%) with false-positive findings, and one patient (1%) with a false-negative finding. When comparing helical CT venography with sonography for the detection of lower extremity deep venous thrombosis, the sensitivity measured 89%; specificity, 94%; positive predictive value, 67%; negative predictive value, 98%; and accuracy, 93%. Of the eight true-positive cases, five had sites of thrombus that were in agreement on both CT venography and sonography. Of the five discordant cases, four were false-positives and one was a false-negative. Possible explanations for all discrepancies were identified.
Compared with sonography, CT venography had a 93% accuracy in identifying deep venous thrombosis. However, the positive predictive value of only 67% for CT venography suggests that sonography should be used to confirm the presence of isolated deep venous thrombosis before anticoagulation is initiated. In addition, interpretation of CT venography should be performed with knowledge of certain pitfalls.
在接受CT血管造影和CT静脉造影联合检查的患者中,将螺旋CT静脉造影检测深静脉血栓形成的准确性与下肢超声检查的准确性进行比较。
确定在1周内接受CT血管造影和CT静脉造影联合检查以及下肢超声检查的患者。评估最终报告中深静脉血栓形成的有无情况。计算螺旋CT静脉造影识别深静脉血栓形成的统计指标。在每例真阳性病例中,比较两种技术所识别血栓的位置。对所有假阳性和假阴性病例进行复查,以确定差异的原因。
纳入74例患者。有8例(11%)为真阳性结果,61例(82%)为真阴性结果,4例(5%)为假阳性结果,1例(1%)为假阴性结果。在比较螺旋CT静脉造影和超声检查对下肢深静脉血栓形成的检测时,敏感性为89%;特异性为94%;阳性预测值为67%;阴性预测值为98%;准确性为93%。在8例真阳性病例中,5例血栓部位在CT静脉造影和超声检查中一致。在5例不一致的病例中,4例为假阳性,1例为假阴性。确定了所有差异的可能解释。
与超声检查相比,CT静脉造影识别深静脉血栓形成的准确性为93%。然而,CT静脉造影仅67%的阳性预测值表明,在开始抗凝治疗前,应使用超声检查来确认孤立性深静脉血栓形成的存在。此外,CT静脉造影的解读应了解某些陷阱。