Mead N, Bower P
National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester, UK.
Soc Sci Med. 2000 Oct;51(7):1087-110. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00098-8.
A 'patient-centred' approach is increasingly regarded as crucial for the delivery of high quality care by doctors. However, there is considerable ambiguity concerning the exact meaning of the term and the optimum method of measuring the process and outcomes of patient-centred care. This paper reviews the conceptual and empirical literature in order to develop a model of the various aspects of the doctor-patient relationship encompassed by the concept of 'patient-centredness' and to assess the advantages and disadvantages of alternative methods of measurement. Five conceptual dimensions are identified: biopsychosocial perspective; 'patient-as-person'; sharing power and responsibility; therapeutic alliance; and 'doctor-as-person'. Two main approaches to measurement are evaluated: self-report instruments and external observation methods. A number of recommendations concerning the measurement of patient-centredness are made.
“以患者为中心”的方法越来越被认为是医生提供高质量医疗服务的关键。然而,关于该术语的确切含义以及衡量以患者为中心的医疗过程和结果的最佳方法,存在相当大的模糊性。本文回顾了概念性和实证性文献,以建立一个涵盖“以患者为中心”概念的医患关系各个方面的模型,并评估替代测量方法的优缺点。确定了五个概念维度:生物心理社会视角;“患者即人”;分享权力和责任;治疗联盟;以及“医生即人”。评估了两种主要的测量方法:自我报告工具和外部观察方法。就以患者为中心的测量提出了一些建议。