• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲以患者为中心的医疗服务实用方法:混合方法研究构建综合癌症护理网络的概念框架

Practical Approaches to Patient-Centered Care in Europe: Mixed Methods Study Developing a Conceptual Framework for Comprehensive Cancer Care Networks.

作者信息

Hickmann Emily, Richter Peggy, Schlieter Hannes, Cemazar Maja, Dudek-Godeau Dorota, Grapentin Nele, Griesshammer Ellen, Jelenc Marjetka, Liutkauskiene Sigita, Ravaud Alain, Troussard Xavier, Wesselmann Simone

机构信息

Technische Universität Dresden, Faculty of Business and Economics, Research Group Digital Health, Dresden, Germany.

Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

出版信息

JMIR Cancer. 2025 Jul 31;11:e59683. doi: 10.2196/59683.

DOI:10.2196/59683
PMID:40743519
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12355145/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In contemporary health care, patient-centered care has emerged as a pivotal paradigm shift that redefines the traditional physician-centric model. Particularly in the context of cancer care, marked by its intricate nature and emotional impact, there is a pressing requirement to rethink how health care is delivered. In this context, comprehensive cancer care networks (CCCNs) provide a new means of structuring and delivering quality cancer care, recognizing each patient's unique preferences and needs.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to establish a consistent definition and framework for patient centeredness in CCCNs, facilitating the integration of a patient-centered approach to enhance care quality.

METHODS

We conducted an umbrella review focusing on generic and oncology-specific dimensions of patient centeredness to establish the definition and framework. The data were analyzed and synthesized using an inductive category development approach, which guided the derivation of dimensions for the framework. The review was complemented by a survey of 23 key stakeholders within CCCNs and a focus group with patient representatives. This process involved iterative group discussions to achieve consensus on the framework and definition.

RESULTS

The study presents a robust definition and framework of patient centeredness tailored to CCCNs, validated by an initial agreement rate of 96% among survey respondents. Patient centeredness in a CCCN is defined as a philosophy of care prioritizing the physical, emotional, and social needs and personal values of patients with cancer at every step of the patient pathway. In patient-centered CCCNs, patients are empowered and engaged in becoming active partners in health care in relation to their individual preferences and capabilities, with the goal of providing personalized, high-quality, holistic care with the best possible outcomes. The framework comprises 8 primary dimensions: empowering patients, engaging and involving patients, treating the patient as a unique person, enhancing the therapeutic relationship, enhancing a patient-centered culture, providing holistic care, recognizing and supporting the health care professional as a person, and coordinating care. Each dimension is supported by specific subdimensions and actionable patient-centered activities that facilitate practical implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

The results provide a comprehensive perspective on the complex elements that compose patient-centered care within CCCNs in Europe. This contributes to a better understanding and application of patient centeredness in cancer care and possibly other contexts. The results presented in this paper promise to support cancer care networks and other health care contexts in creating a patient-centered environment where patients feel genuinely heard, valued, and actively engaged in their care decisions.

摘要

背景

在当代医疗保健中,以患者为中心的护理已成为一种关键的范式转变,重新定义了传统的以医生为中心的模式。特别是在癌症护理的背景下,其具有复杂性和情感影响,迫切需要重新思考医疗保健的提供方式。在这种背景下,综合癌症护理网络(CCCNs)提供了一种构建和提供优质癌症护理的新方式,认识到每个患者的独特偏好和需求。

目的

本研究旨在为CCCNs中以患者为中心建立一致的定义和框架,促进以患者为中心的方法的整合以提高护理质量。

方法

我们进行了一项综合综述,重点关注以患者为中心的一般维度和肿瘤学特定维度,以建立定义和框架。使用归纳类别发展方法对数据进行分析和综合,该方法指导框架维度的推导。该综述辅以对CCCNs内23名关键利益相关者的调查以及与患者代表的焦点小组讨论。这个过程涉及反复的小组讨论,以就框架和定义达成共识。

结果

该研究提出了一个针对CCCNs量身定制的强大的以患者为中心的定义和框架,调查受访者的初始同意率为96%,验证了该定义和框架。CCCNs中的以患者为中心被定义为一种护理理念,在患者就医过程的每一步都优先考虑癌症患者的身体、情感和社会需求以及个人价值观。在以患者为中心的CCCNs中,患者被赋予权力并参与成为医疗保健中的积极伙伴,根据他们的个人偏好和能力,目标是提供个性化、高质量、全面的护理并取得尽可能好的结果。该框架包括8个主要维度:赋予患者权力、让患者参与并融入、将患者视为独特的个体、加强治疗关系、增强以患者为中心的文化、提供全面护理、认可并支持医护人员作为个体、协调护理。每个维度都由特定的子维度和可操作的以患者为中心的活动支持,以促进实际实施。

结论

研究结果为欧洲CCCNs中构成以患者为中心的护理的复杂要素提供了全面的视角。这有助于更好地理解和应用癌症护理及可能其他背景下的以患者为中心。本文呈现的结果有望支持癌症护理网络和其他医疗保健背景创建一个以患者为中心的环境,让患者感到真正被倾听、被重视并积极参与他们的护理决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2507/12355145/7d53f1691828/cancer_v11i1e59683_fig12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2507/12355145/4475d715f719/cancer_v11i1e59683_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2507/12355145/fd99eb711f3e/cancer_v11i1e59683_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2507/12355145/b1aa9b002218/cancer_v11i1e59683_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2507/12355145/ee5e2d0e8256/cancer_v11i1e59683_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2507/12355145/c0bb41600711/cancer_v11i1e59683_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2507/12355145/a52950c9c472/cancer_v11i1e59683_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2507/12355145/a23a9d3d618f/cancer_v11i1e59683_fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2507/12355145/7be15a68b18b/cancer_v11i1e59683_fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2507/12355145/f7bd11795334/cancer_v11i1e59683_fig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2507/12355145/ebae530e731a/cancer_v11i1e59683_fig10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2507/12355145/38f4f424c432/cancer_v11i1e59683_fig11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2507/12355145/7d53f1691828/cancer_v11i1e59683_fig12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2507/12355145/4475d715f719/cancer_v11i1e59683_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2507/12355145/fd99eb711f3e/cancer_v11i1e59683_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2507/12355145/b1aa9b002218/cancer_v11i1e59683_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2507/12355145/ee5e2d0e8256/cancer_v11i1e59683_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2507/12355145/c0bb41600711/cancer_v11i1e59683_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2507/12355145/a52950c9c472/cancer_v11i1e59683_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2507/12355145/a23a9d3d618f/cancer_v11i1e59683_fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2507/12355145/7be15a68b18b/cancer_v11i1e59683_fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2507/12355145/f7bd11795334/cancer_v11i1e59683_fig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2507/12355145/ebae530e731a/cancer_v11i1e59683_fig10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2507/12355145/38f4f424c432/cancer_v11i1e59683_fig11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2507/12355145/7d53f1691828/cancer_v11i1e59683_fig12.jpg

相似文献

1
Practical Approaches to Patient-Centered Care in Europe: Mixed Methods Study Developing a Conceptual Framework for Comprehensive Cancer Care Networks.欧洲以患者为中心的医疗服务实用方法:混合方法研究构建综合癌症护理网络的概念框架
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Jul 31;11:e59683. doi: 10.2196/59683.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
4
Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome全身炎症反应综合征
5
Hail Lifestyle Medicine consensus position statement as a medical specialty: Middle Eastern perspective.欢呼将生活方式医学作为一门医学专业的共识立场声明:中东视角。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 20;13:1455871. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1455871. eCollection 2025.
6
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
7
Patient buy-in to social prescribing through link workers as part of person-centred care: a realist evaluation.患者通过联络人员接受社会处方作为以患者为中心的护理的一部分:一项现实主义评价。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep 25:1-17. doi: 10.3310/ETND8254.
8
Patient Restraint and Seclusion患者约束与隔离
9
A Scoping Review of the Observed and Perceived Functional Impacts Associated With Language and Learning Disorders in School-Aged Children.一项关于学龄儿童语言和学习障碍相关的观察到的和感知到的功能影响的范围综述。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Jul-Aug;60(4):e70086. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70086.
10
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.

本文引用的文献

1
Web-based Guidance for Assisted Reproductive Technology With an Online App (myFertiCare): Quantitative Evaluation With the HOT-fit Framework.基于网络的辅助生殖技术在线应用指导(myFertiCare):应用 HOT-fit 框架的定量评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jan 24;25:e38535. doi: 10.2196/38535.
2
The "teach-back" method improves surgical informed consent and shared decision-making: a proof of concept study.“反馈教学”方法改善手术知情同意和共同决策:一项概念验证研究。
Patient Saf Surg. 2022 Oct 28;16(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13037-022-00342-9.
3
All together now - patient engagement, patient empowerment, and associated terms in personal healthcare.
现在一起 - 患者参与、患者赋权以及个人医疗保健中的相关术语。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Sep 2;22(1):1116. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08501-5.
4
Association Between Patient Portal Use and Perceived Patient-Centered Communication Among Adults With Cancer: Cross-sectional Survey Study.癌症成年患者使用患者门户网站与感知到的以患者为中心的沟通之间的关联:横断面调查研究
JMIR Cancer. 2022 Aug 9;8(3):e34745. doi: 10.2196/34745.
5
Integrating Quality of Life in the Care Pathway of Cancer Patients Undergoing Immunotherapy Treatment: Descriptive, Cross-sectional Survey of an Online Patient Community's Experiences and Expectations.将生活质量纳入接受免疫治疗的癌症患者护理路径:对一个在线患者社区的经历和期望进行描述性横断面调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 11;24(1):e25792. doi: 10.2196/25792.
6
Diversity of interpretations of the concept "patient-centered care for breast cancer patients"; a scoping review of current literature.对“以乳腺癌患者为中心的护理”概念的多样性解释;对当前文献的范围综述。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2022 Oct;28(5):773-793. doi: 10.1111/jep.13584. Epub 2021 May 17.
7
Seeing the Elephant: A Systematic Scoping Review and Comparison of Patient-Centeredness Conceptualizations from Three Seminal Perspectives.洞察本质:从三个开创性视角对以患者为中心的概念进行系统的范围综述与比较
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 Apr 29;14:973-986. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S299765. eCollection 2021.
8
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.《PRISMA 2020声明:报告系统评价的更新指南》
Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 29;10(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4.
9
The empirical evidence underpinning the concept and practice of person-centred care for serious illness: a systematic review.支撑重病患者以人为主的关怀理念和实践的经验证据:系统评价。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Dec;5(12). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003330.
10
Patient and public involvement in the development of clinical practice guidelines: a scoping review protocol.患者及公众参与临床实践指南制定:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 5;10(10):e037327. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037327.