O'Brien W D, Frizzell L A, Weigel R M, Zachary J F
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801, USA.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 Sep;108(3 Pt 1):1290-7. doi: 10.1121/1.1287706.
In animal experiments, the pathogenesis of lung hemorrhage due to exposure to clinical diagnostic levels of ultrasound has been attributed to an inertial cavitation mechanism. The purpose of this article is to report the results of two experiments that directly contradict the hypothesis that ultrasound-induced lung hemorrhage is caused by inertial cavitation. Elevated hydrostatic pressure was used to suppress the involvement of inertial cavitation. In experiment one, 160 adult mice were equally divided into two hydrostatic pressure groups (0.1 or 1.1 MPa), and were randomly exposed to pulsed ultrasound (2.8-MHz center frequency, 1-kHz PRF, 1.42-micros pulse duration, 10-s exposure duration). For the two hydrostatic pressure groups (80 mice each), 8 in situ peak rarefactional pressure levels were used that ranged between 2.82 and 11.8 MPa (10 mice/group). No effect of hydrostatic pressure on the probability of hemorrhage was observed. These data lead to the conclusion that lung hemorrhage is not caused by inertial cavitation. Also, the higher hydrostatic pressure enhanced rather than inhibited the impact of ultrasonic pressure on the severity (hemorrhage area, depth, and volume) of lesions. These counterintuitive findings were confirmed in a second experiment using a 2 x 5 factorial design that consisted of two ultrasonic pressure levels and five hydrostatic pressure levels (100 mice, 10 mice/group). If inertial cavitation were the mechanism responsible for lung hemorrhage, then elevated hydrostatic pressures should have resulted in less rather than more tissue damage at each ultrasonic pressure level. This further supports the conclusion that the pathogenesis of ultrasound-induced lung hemorrhage is not caused by inertial cavitation.
在动物实验中,暴露于临床诊断水平的超声下导致肺出血的发病机制被归因于惯性空化机制。本文的目的是报告两项实验的结果,这些结果直接与超声诱导的肺出血是由惯性空化引起的这一假设相矛盾。使用升高的静水压力来抑制惯性空化的参与。在实验一中,160只成年小鼠被平均分为两个静水压力组(0.1或1.1兆帕),并随机暴露于脉冲超声(中心频率2.8兆赫、脉冲重复频率1千赫、脉冲持续时间1.42微秒、暴露持续时间10秒)。对于两个静水压力组(每组80只小鼠),使用了8个原位峰值稀疏压力水平,范围在2.82至11.8兆帕之间(每组10只小鼠)。未观察到静水压力对出血概率的影响。这些数据得出结论,肺出血不是由惯性空化引起的。此外,较高的静水压力增强而非抑制了超声压力对病变严重程度(出血面积、深度和体积)的影响。在第二个实验中,使用2×5析因设计(由两个超声压力水平和五个静水压力水平组成,共100只小鼠,每组10只)证实了这些与直觉相反的发现。如果惯性空化是导致肺出血的机制,那么在每个超声压力水平下,升高的静水压力应该导致更少而不是更多的组织损伤。这进一步支持了超声诱导的肺出血发病机制不是由惯性空化引起的这一结论。