Miller Douglas L, Dou Chunyan, Raghavendran Krishnan
Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015 Aug;41(8):2212-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.03.030. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
The induction of pulmonary capillary hemorrhage (PCH) by pulsed ultrasound was discovered 25 y ago, but early research used fixed-beam systems rather than actual diagnostic ultrasound machines. In this study, results of exposure of rats to fixed-beam focused ultrasound for 5 min at 1.5 and 7.5 MHz were compared with recent research on diagnostic ultrasound. One exposure condition at each frequency used 10-μs pulses delivered at 25-ms intervals. Three conditions involved Gaussian modulation of the pulse amplitudes at 25-ms intervals to simulate diagnostic scanning: 7.5 MHz with 0.3- and 1.5-μs pulses at 100- and 500-μs pulse repetition periods, respectively, and 1.5 MHz with 1.7-μs pulses at 500-μs repetition periods. Four groups were tested for each condition to assess PCH areas at different exposure levels and to determine occurrence thresholds. The conditions with identical pulse timing resulted in smaller PCH areas for the smaller 7.5-MHz beam, but both had thresholds of 0.69-0.75 MPa in situ peak rarefactional pressure amplitude. The Gaussian modulation conditions for both 7.5 MHz with 0.3-μs pulses and 1.5 MHz with 1.7-μs pulses had thresholds of 1.12-1.20 MPa peak rarefactional pressure amplitude, although the relatively long 1.5-μs pulses at 7.5 MHz yielded a threshold of 0.75 MPa. The fixed-beam pulsed ultrasound exposures produced lower thresholds than diagnostic ultrasound. There was no clear tendency for thresholds to increase with increasing ultrasonic frequency when pulse timing conditions were similar.
25年前发现了脉冲超声可诱导肺毛细血管出血(PCH),但早期研究使用的是固定波束系统,而非实际的诊断超声机器。在本研究中,将大鼠暴露于1.5和7.5MHz的固定波束聚焦超声下5分钟的结果,与近期关于诊断超声的研究进行了比较。每个频率下的一种暴露条件使用以25毫秒间隔发射的10微秒脉冲。三种条件涉及以25毫秒间隔对脉冲幅度进行高斯调制以模拟诊断扫描:7.5MHz时,分别在100和500微秒的脉冲重复周期下使用0.3和1.5微秒的脉冲;1.5MHz时,在500微秒重复周期下使用1.7微秒的脉冲。对每种条件测试四组,以评估不同暴露水平下的PCH面积并确定发生阈值。具有相同脉冲定时的条件下,较小的7.5MHz波束导致的PCH面积较小,但两者的原位峰值稀疏压力幅度阈值均为0.69 - 0.75MPa。7.5MHz使用0.3微秒脉冲和1.5MHz使用1.7微秒脉冲的高斯调制条件下,峰值稀疏压力幅度阈值均为1.12 - 1.20MPa,尽管7.5MHz相对较长的1.5微秒脉冲产生的阈值为0.75MPa。固定波束脉冲超声暴露产生的阈值低于诊断超声。当脉冲定时条件相似时,阈值没有随着超声频率增加而升高的明显趋势。