消费者如何评估医疗保健质量：第三部分。
How consumers evaluate health care quality: Part III.
作者信息
Moore S T, Bopp K D
机构信息
School of Social Work, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211, USA.
出版信息
Health Mark Q. 1999;17(2):1-6. doi: 10.1300/J026v17n02_01.
PMID:11010207
Abstract
This article is the third and final article in a series which examines the way in which consumers assess information regarding the quality of health care services. The previous article focused on consumers' perceptions of health care plans and health insurance companies. This article examines the views of health care consumers regarding hospitals and doctors.
摘要
本文是一个系列文章中的第三篇，也是最后一篇。该系列文章探讨了消费者评估医疗保健服务质量信息的方式。上一篇文章聚焦于消费者对医疗保健计划和健康保险公司的认知。本文则考察了医疗保健消费者对医院和医生的看法。
相似文献
1
How consumers evaluate health care quality: Part III.
Health Mark Q. 1999;17(2):1-6. doi: 10.1300/J026v17n02_01.
2
How consumers evaluate health care quality: Part II.
Health Mark Q. 1999;17(1):1-8.
3
Report cards don't make the grade with physicians or consumers.
Healthc Benchmarks. 2002 Apr;9(4):37-9.
4
How consumers evaluate health care quality: Part I.
Health Mark Q. 1999;16(4):1-6. doi: 10.1300/J026v16n04_01.
5
Health care consumers say they want to know more objective measures about quality.
Qual Lett Healthc Lead. 2001 Apr;13(4):12-3, 1.
6
Issues in the practice of cosmetic surgery: consumers' use of information and perceptions of service quality.
J Health Care Mark. 1991 Sep;11(3):12-8.
7
How consumer assessments of managed care vary within and among markets.
Inquiry. 2000 Summer;37(2):146-61.
8
Putting a new face on managed care. Consumers need convincing about quality issues.
Mark Health Serv. 2002 Spring;22(1):14-9.
9
Survey: consumers willing to accept managed care restrictions.
Capitation Manag Rep. 2005 Feb;12(2):18-21, 1.
10
Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Survey (CAHPS) results for Oklahoma managed care Medicaid, 1997, 1998, and 1999.
J Okla State Med Assoc. 2000 Mar;93(3):109-17.
Zotero 插件